Could be worse, could be better
-
Over the last couple of weeks, I’ve been working in the Squarespace editor for a small client website. Since it seems somewhat obvious WP is building Gutenberg as a response to their editor, I’ve been comparing the two.
My observations:
Blocks > shortcodes. They’ve served WP well up to this point, but the idea of building all of that into a block that can be pointed-and-clicked its way into content is amazing. I expect good things moving forward here.
The editor bar in the text/paragraph boxes needs more options. I’d love to be able to highlight text and turn it into a block, rather than go through the process of converting the block. I think this would be more intuitive and be helpful to non-technical users who are crossing over from the classic editor. (I haven’t reviewed technical documentation yet, but will the editor bar be extendable?)
Clicking the + icon between blocks should give me the option to select the block I want to insert (I know it does this with the one on the side already). This is something I like in Squarespace. If I’m editing a document and adding blocks between things, I’m more than likely wanting to add an image, block quote, etc. rather than another paragraph.
Gutenberg has the potential to be good, but its not there yet. Its sad seeing the fracture that this is creating in the community. From the outside looking in, I think both sides would benefit with some more empathy towards the other. People are very passionate about the websites they create and anything that disrupts or changes that should be taken with care.
- The topic ‘Could be worse, could be better’ is closed to new replies.