Not Opposed to Monetization, Just How It was Done
-
I am one of those people who has no issues with Jetpack deciding to monetize. My issues is how it was done.
On one hand, I get it: it’s not fair that sites that may be making thousands a month are enjoying the benefits of Jetpack for free.
On the other hand, the pricing tier system comes across as elitist, like it’s trying to shake off everyone except the most popular, commercially successful sites that are earning hundreds if not thousands a month. I say this because the pricing doesn’t make sense. Between bots being responsible for so many hits, everyone using ad blockers and ad revenue drying up and other issues, small sites getting between 1000 to 20K a month are lucky to even get a fraction of what Jetpack wants per month.
On top of everything else, the average webhosting package for bloggers or small ecommerce sites is equal to or just a few dollars more than what Jetpack is asking for stats alone, but expects to get 8 bucks a month for 10K visitors? I think that whoever dreamt up this price scheme knows how absurd this is, which is why it feels opportunistic rather than practical. They could’ve very well come up with something more reasonable for small sites that have been using Jetpack for free but wouldn’t mind paying something a little more affordable, but this pricing scheme is just letting the smaller fish loose in favor of whales. Basing a business model on whales has never made much sense to me, but it’s no skin off my nose, so good luck with this newfangled pricing scheme.
- The topic ‘Not Opposed to Monetization, Just How It was Done’ is closed to new replies.