Rating: 1 star
Here is my Reasons a 7 year full-stack and experianced wordpress and PHP developer:
1- waek UI expreince (front or editor)
2- very Complicated to use it (even make a simple row !)
3- Not user friendly at-ALL
4- very very very very VERY Hard & Complicated to develope (even add a simple gutenberg block and use the wordpress translation system in it!! )!
5-Poor Community
6-Poor docs
7- I think the project must stop at all!
Important-Note: One star is too much for this nonsense, if I could I would have given it half a star or more less!
]]>Rating: 5 stars
This plugin is problematic. The developers update it several times a month and are unable to fix the bugs that always occur with each new update. Sometimes they make more than one update in the same day. Today, for example, my site went offline due to a “fatal error” after the Gutenberg update. I received numerous complaints from users of my site and had to revert the update. In fact, the recurring “errors” of this plugin even affect the layout options for the featured images in the posts. There are so many “errors” that I feel like deleting this crap. But unfortunately, I can’t because my site has over 20 thousand posts and if I change the editor now it will be a lot of work. I would like to understand why WordPress chose this plugin as a partner.
……..
Esse plugin é problemático. Os desenvolvedores atualizam várias vezes no mês e n?o conseguem arrumar os bugs que sempre ocorrem a cada nova atualiza??o. Tem vezes que fazem mais de uma atualiza??o em um mesmo dia. Hoje, por exemplo, meu site saiu do ar por “erro fatal” após a atualiza??o do Gutenberg. Recebi inúmeras reclama??es de usuários do meu site e tive que reverter a atualiza??o. Aliás, os “erros” recorrentes desse plugin prejudicam até as op??es de layout das imagens em destaque nas postagens. S?o tantos “erros” que dá vontade de deletar essa porcaria. Mas, infelizmente, n?o posso porque meu site tem mais de 20 mil publica??es e se eu mudar agora o editor vai dar muito trabalho. EU queria entender porque o WordPress escolheu esse plugin como parceiro.
Rating: 5 stars
Get with the program
]]>Rating: 3 stars
Gutenberg makes content creation easy with its block-based design and flexibility.
]]>Rating: 5 stars
Gutenberg is a brilliant little tool for creating content all over the WP portfolio. In the Learn WP forum you see her in her simplest form, and else where she shows her power. I have never (4-5 years) had content posted cause any issue as it get’s tag’ed into html and other code. That means I have never had to fix anything in the code viewer, though it’s there for me. Trust me when I say: All the hate around Gutenberg comes old WP’ers struggling with comfort zone and what they are used to. So please ignore any review under ****. It’s just frustation. Gutenberg looks the part. Clean and minimalistic. Neat icons and easy access to any and all blocks. Gutenberg screams Apple while TinyMCE screams DOS. Seriously!!! A consistent implementation of Gutenberg across any and all WP is given. I cannot wait for it implemented in all plugins, but ofcourse the haters will do what they can to stall this. I am happy to see Woo almost being the first-mover and I cherish the day it comes out of their (Woo) beta state. Let’s see it happen and focus on the beauty of WP. Anyone below 60 years and new to WP will intuitively navigate Gutenberg within 10 minutes. And the best part. It matches anything…
]]>Rating: 1 star
Instead of WordPress becoming a modern cms, integrating the best community plugins, modernizing the database, and fatcilitating headless solutions, we got this:
'\n<div class="wp-block-columns has-3-columns">\n\n\n\n</div>\n',Rating: 3 stars
Lags so much
]]>Rating: 1 star
Why this Fail of a plugin, is still forced upon everyone with a fresh WordPress instance, is beyond reason.
This plugin was terrible when it showed up after it was patched, and it is still terrible today. It should be dead and buried.
Disable Gutenberg plugin will, however, probably still be standing as a monument to this joke.
Rating: 1 star
Very disappointed that this plug-in didn’t come with a warning.
]]>Rating: 1 star
They don’t even try to create html/css. Instead of using classes and clean style/semantic differentiation, they put lots of html-comment-crap inside your code. Instead of a simple ?hr/? you get:
<!-- wp:separator -->
<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>
<!-- /wp:separator -->They don’t use data-attributes, they don’t use custom-elements for things that you can’t do in vanilla html5, they give you tons of comment-spam for even the simplest paragraphs. This bad review is not about the idea behind it, it is abut the absolute worst and buggy implementation possible.
A good editor should strive to output pure html, relying on inline-styles only if absolutely necessary and *never* *ever* rely on comments. Those are purely for developers clarifying things or commenting out sections temporarily.
This. Is. Absolute. Crap.
Rating: 5 stars
I never write reviews because you have to prioritize in life – but I can’t just ignore all these bad reviews.
Point 1: Gutenberg is free and simply unbeatable. It occurs to me, could it be that the competitor (which you have to pay for) is deliberately stirring things up here?
Point 2: A customer who takes over a website will have to learn whichever menu and will need help.
Point 3: Well, I’m not a great professional and even I understand how to set up pages with Gutenberg.
Point 4: The team here offers help to people who complain here and people are not even willing to respond.
Point 5: I can only applaud the philosophy and have to say thank you to a team that puts so much work into it. Please keep up the good work.
Rating: 1 star
I like the flexibility of the Classic Editor. I have tried this editor and it just isn’t good enough. Maybe I will give it another try in a few years. (Heck, I even once swore of WordPress long ago, but now I use it for every website I build.)
]]>Rating: 5 stars
Gutenberg is a great way of developing websites. I definitely believe this is the future of web development.
]]>Rating: 5 stars
The Gutenberg plugin is fantastic! Its block-based editor transforms content creation on WordPress, making it intuitive and code-free. The variety of blocks and customization options allow for unique layouts, significantly improving my workflow. Highly recommend for an enhanced WordPress experience!
]]>Rating: 1 star
After so many years, they don’t improve or fix the issues, they even introduce new issues. They even make you to do additional clicks and steps for doing things you did in one click on the first Guternberg version.
They didn’t make any usability improvements in all these years, speaking about usability, it is even worse now than at the beginning.
]]>Rating: 2 stars
I’ve had a difficult experience with the Gutenberg plugin. Despite its modern approach, it has numerous issues that hinder its usability. I found it more frustrating than helpful.
]]>Rating: 5 stars
Very handy for testing features before they are released in the latest version of WP. And personally I love it because I like to use the latest features in advance, so I often use the Gutenberg plugin on sites in development that will launch close to or after the next version of WP comes out.
]]>Rating: 1 star
Hasta este editor de comentarios está con Gutenberg, realmente es lo peor, yo que soy desarrollador tengo que estar deshabilitandolo con algun plugin o con código, una vez intenté usarlo y está muy pero muy por debajo que los maquetadores con Elementor por ejemplo.
]]>Rating: 5 stars
Gutenberg is the editor of the future. Change always disturbs. But it’s worth it.
]]>Rating: 1 star
I am trying my best to make use of Gutenberg as it is the future of WordPress. I am using it with the GeneratePress theme that is generally well regarded in the community.
I think a source of great frustration is the constant breaking changes in the default CSS styles from Gutenberg, even when not using the Gutenberg “beta testing” plugin, but mainline WordPress releases. Whenever there is a change to styles, they really should be behind a feature flag so that theme developers can enable them after thourough testing.
It is not just convoluted edge cases that are failing either. I currently have two GitHub issues open about theme’s link colors being overriden and padding of unorded lists being removed when inside a standard group block.
I try to use the default Gutenberg blocks when possible, expecting it to be better for maintainability. Perhaps that is the wrong choice.
This does not fit with WordPress’ usual commitment to backwards compatibility. Plugin APIs are generally solid but Gutenberg’s CSS is a constant Whak-A-Mole.
]]>Rating: 1 star
Worst and complicated, absolutely usеless page builder!
]]>Rating: 5 stars
I don’t understand why people rant about this plugin. this a preview of upcoming features for the core WP editor, which, by the way, is called Gutenberg.
And yes, it’s much better to let people try the beta by installing the plugin, which they can uninstall at any time, than to go through a complicated beta program.
As for the many complaints about the core WP gutenberg, WP is flexible, it’s one’s choice to disable block editor, or even disable visual editor altoghether. WP provides such freedom, unlike other CMSs.
The one thing I miss is the WP tavern reviews of Gutenberg plugin, the existing changelog is not very explanatory and does not highlight relevant features.
Kudos for G and FSE!
Rating: 1 star
I really can’t understand why this terrible thing still exists and even get some new features and updates. It’s so bad – the first thing I do on all websites is disabling it and installing classic editor.
Rating: 5 stars
It have been a couple of years but I still don’t see any proper solution for Responsive design
]]>Rating: 1 star
Poor layout management
]]>Rating: 5 stars
I am converting all my posts in Gutenberg. There are 2 benefits:
Time to write is not better, not worse. Equal.
I even start to use Gutenberg on products.
I think it’s the right time to do it. Switch in future will be dramatically harder, and the logic of WordPress makes a lot of sense. Many things will become simplier later. I am impressed by the improvements that were made.
Of course, the editor lacks a few elements, but they are easy to find elsewhere. But I am on content quality, but not on visual gimmicks. Of course, there is a learning curve, that’s always the case when you change your way to work.
]]>Rating: 2 stars
é para ser simples só que n?o é, ao criar uma lista até você achar como troca a cor do texto é mais rápido deletar o elemento criar tudo manualmente no código.
]]>Rating: 1 star
We still can’t find a place for Guts as we lovingly call it. I cant train clients to use it, I personally dont see anything that will help my work flow as a web dev and I really cant handle the HTML code and the messy messy way they setup the raw code views.
I spend most of my time removing Gutenberg’s frankly horrid code from users’ sites so they can get back to an editor that is not confusing and very black-box. As a dev I just cant see an advantage, the HTML is so mangled as its created. Also the recent block changes to WooCommerce really messed up a lot of sites I manage.
I have used a variety of builders and just hard code in the classic editor as for me this is the ceiling of what site owners want and also what they can handle. I think this is being built by folks who with all respect dont use WP in a real world way.
This is a nice idea, but there are so many builders that work, these could be aquired easily and brought into core. This is not working as is, there has been years and years of this and its barely at alpha stages, it also is not faster or easy to use straight out of the box, it is missing features. When Guts is done I fear it will be either anemic for features or like JetPack just a total overload.
Not a single new business inquiry related to Gutenberg either, other than folks who dont know what it is, but that their site looks defaced, after the builder messed something up.
This project needs imo to be scrapped or moved out of core, how likely this is now I dont know. But it has no real goal, no real way to measure what it meant to do and where it is going.
]]>Rating: 1 star
Gutenberg seems to be fraught with bugs, and its features feel quite restricted. For instance, adding gallery columns fails to insert any class, disrupting the design, and the drag & drop functionality for elements is far from smooth. Based on my 14 years of experience with WordPress, I believe that immediate improvements to Gutenberg are necessary to prevent detriment to WordPress’s overall usability and reputation.
]]>Rating: 5 stars
I’ve been using the site editor to build my entire WordPress site and have been impressed how rapidly the user experience and functionality has improved over the last few months. Even in WordPress core, some aspects are still a little rough but it’s clear where the tools are heading and how powerful they will be. The Gutenberg plugin with more experimental features fixes up a lot of the quality-of-life issues with site editing in WordPress core and it’s good to be able to get new features early even if they are a little rough initially.
I don’t think without the site editing and block editing functionality I would have chosen the WordPress platform.