https://beta.okaya.com/display-products/oled/graphic-oled

Would I be creating a view myself — and build out the URL for the product column to go to a detail page? I was reading a post here on the forum where someone else asked about displaying a view without the column headers. Is this somewhat the same way I would do it?

Also, is there a way to change the titles of the columns too?

Thank you.
Joe

United States Ashburn, United States was blocked for Manual block by administrator at www.website.com/bla-bla-url
7/22/2018 2:08:26 PM (51 seconds ago)
IP: 54.237.125.34 Hostname: ec2-54-237-125-34.compute-1.amazonaws.com
Human/Bot: Bot
Browser: undefined
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.2.8) Googlebot-Compatible Gecko/20100723 Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Firefox/3.6.8

and

Bulgaria Sofia, Bulgaria was blocked for Manual block by administrator at www.website.com/bla-bla-url
7/22/2018 2:08:14 PM (1 minute ago)
IP: 151.237.25.65 Hostname: 151.237.25.65.bglan.net
Human/Bot: Bot
Browser: Edge version 16.0 running on Win10
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/58.0.3029.110 Safari/537.36 Edge/16.16299

I went to Wordfence, Firewall, Blocking and under Hostname I said amazonaws.com but nothing. It does not block the entire domain. Then I said in Referrer amazonaws still nothing. It only works when I manually block their IPS but no matter how many I block they always come with new IPs. This is perhaps the most inefficient way to block such an attack, by IP… I know I can block IP ranges but I still find this highly inefficient as they can always come up with new IP ranges. So I want to block their entire hostnames.

I am running Apache 2.4 and I even tried adding various blocking codes in .htaccess but still nothing, their hits show up in live traffic. Why?

Here’s what I tried:
<RequireAll>
Require all granted
Require not host amazonaws.com
Require not host bglan.net
Require not host poneytelecom.eu
Require not host your-server.de
</RequireAll>

And this code doesn’t work because since they are blocked in .htaccess directly by Apache, they shouldn’t even show up in Wordfence live traffic. Since they DO show up I guess my blocking codes from .htaccess don’t work for some reason. Does anyone have a correct .htaccess blocking code for blocking these bots from ever accessing the site or an explanation why Wordfence isn’t blocking their hostnames? Please help. Thank you

Error: https://grab.by/LKWW

Also, here is the trace of the SAML call from Firefox trace. https://grab.by/LKXy

I believe the binding issue is the matter?

Here are my settings. https://grab.by/LKYu

Any help would be great.
Thank you!

https://www.ads-software.com/plugins/saml-20-single-sign-on/

function bold_headline_theme_customizer( $wp_customize ) {

	$wp_customize->add_setting( 'bold_headline[nav_color]', array(
        'default'   => '#404040',
        'transport' => 'postMessage',
    ) );

    $wp_customize->add_control( new WP_Customize_Color_Control( $wp_customize, 'bold_headline[nav_color]', array(
        'label'	   => 'Navigation Bar Color',
        'section'  => 'colors',
        'settings' => 'bold_headline[nav_color]',
    ) ) );

}
add_action('customize_register', 'bold_headline_theme_customizer');

...

function bold_headline_add_customizer_css() {
	<style>
		.navigation-main,
		.navigation-main ul ul {
			background: <?php echo get_theme_mod( 'bold_headline[nav_color]', '#404040' ); ?>;
		}

	</style>
<?php }
add_action( 'wp_head', 'bold_headline_add_customizer_css' );

My javascript file has the following:

wp.customize( 'bold_headline[nav_color]', function( value ) {
        value.bind( function( to ) {
            $('.navigation-main, .navigation-main ul ul').css('background', to );     

        });
    });

I’m enqueuing the js has recommended.
If I use the setting bold_headline[nav_color] I can customize the colour and see it in the preview. i.e, the javascript is doing what it’s supposed to. However, no value is picked up by get_theme_mod and the css is left blank.

If I change the value from bold_headline[nav_color] to nav_color, then the custom CSS displays as it should in the header, but the js stops working.

I’m clearly missing something somewhere and would love a fresh set of eyes to look at this.

Thanks

Here it is

Thanks in advance!

DownloadManager Information: 0 : User has canceled the current installation

————————————-

It has come to our attention that you have a script/application in your
webspace that is attempting to bind a port to the local servers IP address.

To bind a port in such a fashion, this would require you to have a Dedicated
Server. Currently you are signed up for one of our Shared hosting packages
which do not allow port binding.

The script that you are using is located at the path specified below:

u35596838 has /kunden/usr/bin/perl listening on *:9098:

The script was executed with the following command:

Commandline: pure-ftpd (IDLE)

There are steps that you can take to correct this in most cases. We recommend
that you take a close look at your script to determine if you are trying to
make an FTP connection. When attempting to make an Active (PORT) connection,
this requires the local server to listen on a port. Changing the script to make
a Passive (PASV) connection will cause the remote server to listen on a
specified port, thus eliminating the scripts attempt to bind to a local port.

Example of a short PHP script that uses passive ftp:

<?php $file = ‘somefile.txt’;
$remote_file = ‘readme.txt’;

// set up basic connection
$conn_id = ftp_connect($ftp_server);

// login with username and password
$login_result = ftp_login($conn_id, $ftp_user_name, $ftp_user_pass);

// turn passive mode on
ftp_pasv($conn_id, true);

// upload a file
if (ftp_put($conn_id, $remote_file, $file, FTP_ASCII)) {
echo “successfully uploaded $file\n”;
} else {
echo “There was a problem while uploading $file\n”;
}

// close the connection
ftp_close($conn_id);
?>

You can see in the script the connection type is specified with the line:

ftp_pasv($conn_id, true);

This is the most important line in the script which turns passive mode on which
will prevent the script from binding a local port.

If you did not write the script/application, we recommend that you contact the
developer for further help in resolving this issue. Reminder, we do not provide
any type of script debugging and will not analyze your script to determine what
is causing the attempt to bind a port.

———————————-
(The rest was just warnings to me to change it or have my webspace locked out.)

I don’t want to take WordPress off as it has taken me this long to get it running.
They are telling me to contact my developer (that would be WordPress) for help.
So, help, please!

Karen