Thanks Full to You Everyone
]]>I used to upload images on the Cloudinary website, but now with this plugin, I can do everything without leaving my website.
If you want to improve your SEO metrics and the speed of your website, I highly recommend Cloudinary.
The best part is that it’s free!
]]>congrats to the new 2.0 version! My website does not supply me with CWV values (all pages/metrix are N/A), but PSI works fine. Instead of being stuck with the second best (lab) option, what does one have to do to get CWV working?
best regards Stefan
]]>- A load delay of 2,260 ms for one of the images used in the hero banner
- Render blocking resources of https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.2/jquery.min.js
Any idea how to address these two issues and improve core web vitals as a result?
]]>I noticed that 2 days after I installed the plugin, the core web vitals report in GSC started showing issues with LCP in half of my article pages. Then a few days after that, traffic started dropping.
I understand that CWV are not a ‘big’ ranking factor so that might not be causing the drop in traffic, but keen to get some thoughts on this. Thank you! 
The report on Google Search Console shows few URLs as “Poor URLs”, then over 95% of the URLs on the site as “Needing improvement.”
The report for desktop version is almost the same.
How can I improve on my Core Web Vitals especially as it has to do with URLs?
]]>If you’re looking for a plugin to speed up and optimize your website then this is the one you’re looking for. Just give it a try!
]]>I try to pass my Core Web Vitals assessments, but currently my desktop version is failing for CLS. The main issue of complaint seems to be a lack of explicit width/height and the image giving them the most trouble is the full width image at the top of the page. Looking at the HTML, there doesn’t seem to be explicit img width or img height info, but when I tried to add it into the code directly it did not go well. Any ideas?
]]>Focusing on Core web vitals, LCP specifically, I’ve come across an issue where if your LCP element on a page is a YouTube video and you have this plugin’s YouTube placeholders enabled, the plugin will set up a placeholder image instead of loading the YT emebed immediately, BUT it will set this image as lazy-loaded – this contributes to a lower LCP score.
You can use the attribute data-no-lazy=”1″ on the YT video iframe-e but that will also disable the YouTube placeholder functionality.
I have no proof of this but it could possibly improve the LCP score, if we could only disable the lazy-loading of the YT placeholder image without completely disabling the YT placeholder functionality, maybe with a new data attribute like data-no-lazy-yt-placeholder=”1″
If I missed something and this is already possible, please suggest how
Thank you for the help, the plugin and the effort
I am struggling for months already to fix the CLS issue to pass Core Web Vitals. The issue is ”Avoid large layout shifts”.
I have read the instructions that Pagespeed Insights provided (https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls?utm_source=lighthouse&utm_medium=lr)
Since I am kinda rooking in coding, I really don’t know where and how to start, so hopefully some master here can help me out.
Below I have the 5 DOM element that’s causing the CLS
Please guide me step by step how to solve this.
]]>