Thank you for the real plugin that allows easy customization and more. I am looking for a way to make spacing, merging, and or padding of my CFF form and its fields less or more compact. What CSS class(es) I should use. Is there some common CSS classes that I can use for controlling spacing regardless of the used form template? My form shows by clicking on a button that says Book Your Test Drive on any car page here. For example, this page.
Thank you.
]]>thanks.
]]>I am still trying to fix the merge functionality… so now I tried to merge the cart in plain Javascript but that also does not work. Are you sure that this is not a bug?
Link to demo: https://playcode.io/878192/
Will it be helpful if I put the actual token in there? Let me know!
Greetings,
Julian
I am back again with another question. The merge feature is not working correctly for me in Flutter. The cart does get merged but the row does not get deleted in the database when using Flutter.
It only works when I merge the cart of a guest to a logged-in user in Postman. Then the row is removed in the CoCart table.
P.S. I updated all the WP plugins already
Do you have any idea why this is happening?
Thanks!
]]>I’ve been using Yoast for a while (thanks for a great product!) and have a good Google ranking for both individual sites. I am obviously keen not to lose the rankings on mysite.it while moving to the combined mysite.com. I also need to make sure I’m not competing with myself on the Italian content at any point.
I’ve taken the xml sitemap and I am building up a list of redirects from the old to the new. I’ve read Yoast’s page about canonical URLs. I’ve also read Google’s advice on moving sites in the Google search console. But I can’t find anything that specifically tells me how to sequence combining sites like this.
Do I:
1. Keep the .it site running for a while, with 301 redirects to the .com site? (I’ve used the Redirection plugin in the past, and would use it for this.) Or
2. Keep the .it site running for a while, with canonical URLs set in the Advanced settings of the Yoast SEO meta box? Or
3. Redirect the whole .it site from day one to the .com site at the domain level and hope for the best (in multiple choice questions, there’s always a stupid answer, right?).
I’d be nervous about (3) because some of the site’s structure will also be changing, with some pages also being split and merged, so I’d like some way of telling Google etc where the new info is. I mention this option because it would certainly make sure that I wasn’t competing with myself on the Italian content at any point.
(1) is my favorite option, although in the past I’ve seen a Google article saying that if you’re moving sites, don’t do it in stages, but get it done in one go (though the move scenario doesn’t match my case, as I’m combining sites, not moving them).
For (2), Yoast’s article on canonicals says that “If you are unsure whether to do a 301 redirect or set a canonical, what should you do? The answer is simple: you should always do a redirect unless there are technical reasons not to.” But again, this isn’t specifically addressing the issue of merging sites. Additionally, this approach would not allow me to redirect attachment pages properly (and as the site’s images crop up a fair amount of searches, they probably help push up the rankings too).
So to the question: from a Yoast/SEO point of view, is approach (1) better than (2) in order to maintain rankings? Also: Am I missing a better, completely different, approach?
Any advice very welcome. There seems to be a dearth of info on this.
]]>I’m confused: is this plugin still needed?
My understanding is that the new admin interface is already included in WooCommerce since version 4.0:
“Previously a feature plugin, it comes automatically installed with WooCommerce 4.0.”
Thank you
Daniele
As far I know, customers, products and products variations, orders have a unique ID auto generated by WC.
My concern is to keep the ID’s attributed by the second install on the merged install, mainly to allow customers of the second one now merged to keep trace of what they did.
Obviously there is duplicates ID’s beetween the two install also. Not a lot but some.
Is there any clean solution to do that ? And, in that case, can you enlight me ?
Thanks by advance,
Regards,
Eric
]]>After updating FVM to 3.04 this problem is still present but 2 of the 5 css files which were previously merged are now left out. There seems to be something screwed up with the merging.
]]>Thanks. I can’t find a solution anywhere!
]]>