It’s a shame they felt the need to remove the ability to edit the footer.. Maybe they will reconsider ? I’d gladly put this to 5* if they did.

But since that day I experienced few images were detached which we solved later. few imaged and form stopped showing up, so upon your suggestion I disabled lazy loading , then it started showing up nicely.
But the overall speed of the site slowed down by around 80% since I installed Smush. Something has happened which has made almost all the pages to load slowly for desktop, mobile and tablet too.

I dont’ have any solution.

Help!

Prashant…

I have created listings using the Directorist plugin and everything looks great on first view – all results display on a nice grid etc. However, when i click into any of the individual listings it will display the listing ok on a PC, but not on any mobile device. On a phone or tablet, i need to scroll to find the actual information on each page. And when i zoom in to view it, it actually zooms out and makes it smaller! Just to reiterate – the full listings when displayed look fine and are mobile optimised, but each individual listing when viewed is not optimised.

Any ideas?

Thanks!

This plugin is incredibly straightforward to set up, replacing WordPress’s built-in gallery and therefore not requiring the use of different shortcodes (like many other gallery plugins).

Works great alongside the Meow Lightbox and Retina 2x plugins too.

Jordy (the developer) has also been very responsive and helpful in providing support, as and when needed. Can’t recommend it enough.

David has done a great job of keeping the theme super fast but still having the essential features that give the most control during development. The premium add-on is worth looking at as new features are being added month on month.

I would recommend this theme to beginners building their first website and web designers creating sites on tight deadlines as the flexibility, minimalist design and speed are a real bonus.

No matter what I try I can’t seem to get the optimised version to look okay on a mobile.

Please can someone help.
thanks

When I run Google Insights or Pagespeed on my Chrome browser, I get images need to be reduced:
The following images are resized in HTML or CSS. Serving scaled images could save 422.7KiB (89% reduction).
https://tampertime.com/…/IMG_5923-w2000-960×720.jpg is resized in HTML or CSS from 960×720 to 309×232. Serving a scaled image could save 122.4KiB (89% reduction).
https://tampertime.com/…/Passion-for-Coffee-2-960×704.jpg is resized in HTML or CSS from 960×704 to 309×226. Serving a scaled image could save 102.3KiB (89% reduction).
https://tampertime.com/…/coffee-plant-960×720.jpg is resized in HTML or CSS from 960×720 to 309×232. Serving a scaled image could save 95.3KiB (89% reduction).
https://tampertime.com/…/IMG_4993-960×720.jpg is resized in HTML or CSS from 960×720 to 309×232. Serving a scaled image could save 84.8KiB (89% reduction).
https://tampertime.com/…/Photo-3-13-15-2-17-17-PM-960×398.jpg is resized in HTML or CSS from 960×398 to 309×128. Serving a scaled image could save 18.0KiB (89% reduction).

Configured:
Checked – JPG cloud optimisation
Checked – Remove metadata
Checked – Lossy JPG optimisation
Checked – Exclude full-size images from lossy optimisation
Checked – Exclude full-size images from metadata removal

I’m using CloudFlare but I checked on the server itself testing specifically with the image: https://tampertime.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/coffee-plant-480×360.jpg
The image is 65kb. I tested locally with Shrink ‘o matic and I got it reduced to 35kb easily.

When I go to Bulk Optimise it says:
63 images in the Media Library have been selected (0 unoptimized), with 797 resizes (0 unoptimized).
Previously optimized images will be skipped by default.

What am I doing wrong?

https://www.ads-software.com/plugins/ewww-image-optimizer/

Hope you are well.

Firstly, thanks for providing such a great plugin! I’ve been testing it on a site that I am building for a client of mine and it’s exactly what she needs.

However, unfortunately the plugin doesn’t seem to be optimised to be compatible with any x2 retina handling plugins (such as WP Retina 2x, which is what I normally use), and so my client will have to do it the old way for now

Anyway, just thought I would mention it in the hope that this is will be taken into account in a future update of your otherwise great plugin.

Cheers,

Jonas

https://www.ads-software.com/plugins/post-thumbnail-editor/

https://www.ads-software.com/plugins/jetpack/