Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • Moderator James Huff

    (@macmanx)

    But the “main” validator, feedvalidator.org, just comes back with a Server returned timed out error.

    That has nothing to do with your feed. It means FeedValidator can’t reach your site, either the problem is on FV’s end or yours. If you can access your site, then the problem is on FV’s end.

    To be honest though, FeedValidator was surpassed by https://validator.w3.org/feed/ a while ago, that’s the only one I’d recommend trusting.

    And, with that said, your feed is valid: https://validator.w3.org/feed/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwoormoretotango.com%2F%3Ffeed%3Dpodcast

    Thread Starter docdaddy

    (@docdaddy)

    Thanks. What bugs me – I can insert the RSS feed for friends’ podcast, and they immediately come up as valid. In fact, I tested the feed for a couple of friends who use WordPress/Powerpress for very similar site types, and their podcast feeds validate immediately. So FeedValidator is working for everyone else. I see that other feed validators show my feed as valid, and I suppose I should just stop being so anal – I’m just concerned that once I get going, whatever it is that Feedvalidator.org chokes on will choke other podcast feed gatherers.

    SOMETHING is different in my feed than others, even when I uninstall WordPress completely, reinstall, and install only Powerpress and put up one simple podcast. Ugh

    Moderator James Huff

    (@macmanx)

    Don’t worry about it, FV is old, outdated. On one hand, just because it says your feed is unreachable doesn’t mean it’s actually unreachable. On the other hand, just because it says your friend’s feed is valid doesn’t mean it’s actually valid.

    Stick with https://validator.w3.org/feed/ it’s more up to date and is managed by the group that has been providing validators for the web since day 1.

    Thread Starter docdaddy

    (@docdaddy)

    I think, since EVERY other feed validator is coming back as valid, I’ll stop wasting time on it. If at some point I find out some podcast gatherer, or iTunes, has an issue, I’ll deal with it then.

    One issue I see with https://validator.w3.org/feed/ – it will often come back with valid, then often come back with “this looks like a web site and not an RSS” or something, and when you look at the lines it shows below, you can see it is getting fed back a site with a Captcha and saying the IP 128.30.52.88 is a known spam site. I have to try several times to get it to validate.

    Moderator James Huff

    (@macmanx)

    Weird, this time I got:

    Server returned [Errno 111] Connection refused

    Who is your hosting provider, and what plugins are you using besides PowerPress?

    Thread Starter docdaddy

    (@docdaddy)

    Arvixe is the web host. I have had the site set up with no plugins except Powerpress to test it. I am currently adding some plugins back – right now just some very basic ones (broken link checker, etc.)

    I find that about half the time when I enter my feed into W3c, I get this:

    It looks like this is a web page, not a feed. I looked for a feed associated with this page, but couldn’t find one. Please enter the address of your feed to validate.
    Source: https://twoormoretotango.com/?feed=podcast

    <html>
           <head>
          <title>Visitor anti-robot validation</title>
               <meta charset="UTF-8" />
               <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" />
               <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="css/style.css" />
           </head>
           <body>
    
            <div class="container">
            <div>
        <h1>Dear visitor</h1>
        <p>To reach the website securely, please fill in the characters shown below.</p>
        <p><strong></strong></p>
        </div>
        <div class="left">
        <img src="img/logo.png" alt="" />
        </div>
        <div class="right">
        <form method="post" action="/verify.php">
                   <script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/challenge?k=6LfRteUSAAAAAFQ4IlQQdjP_E7ek9ElCzSo5TDxC"></script>
    
        <noscript>
          <iframe src="https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/noscript?k=6LfRteUSAAAAAFQ4IlQQdjP_E7ek9ElCzSo5TDxC" height="300" width="500" frameborder="0"></iframe>
          <textarea name="recaptcha_challenge_field" rows="3" cols="40"></textarea>
          <input type="hidden" name="recaptcha_response_field" value="manual_challenge"/>
        </noscript>
                   <input type="hidden" name="origin_url" value="" />
                   <input type="submit" value="Delist" />
               </form>
        </div>
        <div class="clear"></div>
            <div>
        <h1>Why is it necessary?</h1>
        <p>Your IP address (128.30.52.88) has been blocked for security reason. Probably your IP address has been used for violation of server security rules before.</p>
        <p>We have to make sure that this is not a malicious visit by an automated robot. Filling in the captcha is required to delist you IP address.</p>
        <p>Thank you.</p>
        <hr/>

    128.30.52.88 comes back to MIT, and I saw posts online saying it should be whitelisted because w3c uses it. Not sure why I get that so often when I enter my feed in. Seems random – part of the time I get that, part of the time valid. All other validators other than feedvalidator.org come back valid.

    Moderator James Huff

    (@macmanx)

    Ok, so the text in there pretty much describes what’s going on.

    “[The validator’s] IP address (128.30.52.88) has been blocked for security reason. Probably [The validator’s] IP address has been used for violation of server security rules before.”

    Then it goes on to ask the validator to prove it’s a human by entering a captcha, which of course it’s not going to do.

    Normally, this is a good thing and wouldn’t be a problem, but it seems hyper-aggressive to me (unless you’ve been hammering it with several validation checks per minute).

    I recommend asking your hosting provider if this is some sort of server-side security they have running, and if so, as them to tone it down a bit.

    Thread Starter docdaddy

    (@docdaddy)

    That wouldn’t effect feedvalidator.org, though, would it? They don’t use the same IPs as w3c, I assume?

    Moderator James Huff

    (@macmanx)

    That would be assuming this thing will only ever block one IP. It’s probably blocking some of FV’s IPs for the very same reason.

    Thread Starter docdaddy

    (@docdaddy)

    Good point. I wonder how I can find out the IPs FV is using?

    Moderator James Huff

    (@macmanx)

    You’d have to ask them, or you could do as mentioned 40 minutes ago and just contact your hosting provider. ??

    You want them to tone down the aggressiveness of their blocker overall, not just whitelist a few validators that you shouldn’t be hammering your server with so frequently anyway.

    Thread Starter docdaddy

    (@docdaddy)

    I’ve been emailing back and forth with the hosting provider all day on this. In fact, one of the tech support guys gave up and handed it off to someone else. About to go on live chat and talk to someone – I doubt he had the authority to lower Arvixe’s blocker overall, but he may can show me how to whitelist myself. (I noticed in the about tab, FV “is distributed under the MIT license” so I wouldn’t be surprised if they aren’t using the same servers.

    Moderator James Huff

    (@macmanx)

    MIT License https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License is quite different from MIT itself https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_Institute_of_Technology

    The MIT License was developed at MIT, but any software can use it. It has no relation to whether or not that software/service is hosted in MIT data centers.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Software_using_the_MIT_license

    At this point though, what you are running into is not a WordPress issue, so we really can’t help with this any further. You’ll need to work it out with your host.

    Thread Starter docdaddy

    (@docdaddy)

    You are correct, and help was very much appreciated.

    Moderator James Huff

    (@macmanx)

    You’re welcome!

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • The topic ‘Can't get it to validate.’ is closed to new replies.