code [img] for photo

[wppa type=”photo” photo=”123″ size=”0.5″][/wppa] generates 50% image

I not about the size, you not correctly understood me.
For image use on other sites, the physical address of the image is necessary. For example:
there is a photo here – https://wowcamera.info/fotonews/wp-content/uploads/wppa/19.jpg
for this purpose that the user could know this address, it needs to be shown under a photo. It can be done in processing of boxes but if I there make hands changes that at an update everything will be gone.
and why that I have no display of the author under a photo. that shows that on the button to load it isn’t read.
thanks.

Do you know the concept of w#-keywords?
See https://wppa.opajaap.nl/geographic-data/

I can add w#url if you wish.

w#-keywords – in the administrator I didn’t find where to adjust.
yes the physical address of a photo is necessary.
thanks.

Ok, i will add w#url in the enxt version.

ok! thanks!

Something like this:

https://beta.opajaap.nl/generic-2/?lang=en&wppa-album=2&wppa-cover=0&wppa-occur=1&wppa-photo=0162h1

??

yes, well so. =)
thanks.

not automatic append for all new photo?
I add append – upload newn photo and not show his.
?

Custom box doesn’t process codes w#name, w#filename, w#owner, w#id, w#tags, w#timestamp, w#modified, w#views, w#amx and w#amy.

tags and the description it is good. but the separate block that the author of a photo didn’t spoil the necessary code is necessary.
how to make that the @custom box@ processed these codes?
thanks.

That can not be done in the custom box, that is static.

You can add it to the standard description ( Table IX-D5 ) and apply to all photos in Table VII-B4.

There is not yet a way to block the upploader from editing the description.

That could be added as an option if you like.

And it is possible to make the second block for the description?
To use the first for common goals the administrator, with an editing ban for authors. And the second block for authors, the description sometimes is necessary.
If there is no such opportunity, then add function of a ban of editing of the description only.
Thanks.