Thanks again for the response.
Over the weekend I went > Images and clicked on > Mark All Images as Uncompresssed, waited for the Uncompressed Images field to populate, then bulk recompressed all my images again.
With the “Automatically compress newly-added images” function still on, I then uploaded some new, uncompressed images as a test. They did indeed now appear in the Uncompressed Images field, and were indeed eventually compressed with a significant savings.
To answer your question: Before my bulk recompression procedure: No, newly uploaded images did not appear in the Uncompresssed Images field, but now they do. I do not know why. Nor do I know why all my images were previously labeled “compressed with 0 percent savings.” But I’m fine with it as long as it works, so you don’t need to try to troubleshoot that any further.
The issue I discovered after the bulk compression of all my images is that clicking on “Mark All Images as Uncompresssed” does *not* actually mark *all* images as uncompressed and does *not* include them in the bulk recompression.
After the bulk recompression finished, I found hundreds of images marked “This image is already compressed by another plugin” that were not recompressed by WPO but that have no visible function or button with which to mark them as “uncompressed,” so I’m having to recompress them all manually, which is, as you know enormously time intensive.
So my new questions:
(1) Are those intentionally *not* included under “mark all images as uncompressed”? They do, after all, belong to “all images” in the media library;
(2) If they are are not included in “all images,” how does the user know? Does WPO tell the user somewhere that they will not be included? I never saw any message like that.
(3) is there any way to find them and mark them all (bulk) as uncompressed so WPO will add them to the uncompressed field? This seems like a curious oversight. I don’t understand why “mark all images” does not really “mark all images.”
Perhaps your team could change the plugin’s behavior with this aspect?
Thanks again for your responses.