• So the output of a search only tells you there were matches but doesn’t list them? Terrible and useless.

Viewing 7 replies - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Plugin Contributor Matt Shaw

    (@mattshaw)

    This is a feature in the pro version. If you want to see more details, upgrade to that version.

    The fact that the free plugin has over 80,000 downloads and 35 5 star reviews should indicate that it is not “terrible and useless”.

    If you have any other complaints aside from the lack of a feature that is in the pro version, please open a support thread and I’d be happy to address them.

    This is an unfair 1-star review. I just used this after having technical difficulties with Velvet URLS and will buy Better Search Replace Pro just to support this author. Great tool.

    Thread Starter Bob Weber

    (@robertjw)

    This plugin has been named the “Better” Search Replace, while the functionality is less than the old Search & Replace plugin by Frank Bültge.

    Maybe he named it Better because it is better than all the others? For me, $19 to support an author that saved me 30 minutes or more is well worth it (even though i don’t even need or use the Pro features). And maybe if ppl like you supported authors more often, your “old Search & Replace plugin by Frank” would still be actively maintained?

    Plugin Contributor Matt Shaw

    (@mattshaw)

    @mostlyjan Thanks for the support!

    @robertjw

    This plugin has been named the "Better" Search Replace, while the functionality is less than the old Search & Replace plugin by Frank Bültge.

    That’s simply not true. Different functionality, sure.

    – Did that plugin have batch processing and multisite support?
    – Did that plugin have serialization support for arrays and objects on every table?
    – Was that plugin frequently updated?

    Again, the functionality you’re looking is available in the pro version. Leaving a 1 star review, and calling the plugin “terrible and useless”, isn’t going to make me change my mind and put it in the free version.

    If you had opened a support thread with a request to do so, along with solid reasoning, I would have been much more likely to have considered.

    Thread Starter Bob Weber

    (@robertjw)

    OK, fair enough. I can certainly appreciate that you have added additional functionality and updates. I’m also think you are entitled to be compensated for your work with the pro version.

    Just a little irritated that a plugin I’ve used for years has disappeared and it’s replacement has been crippled to not include the feature I used the most, but you are right I have overreacted. I updated my review to a 3 star, one was certainly too harsh, but I’m still not thrilled.

    I’m not really trying to get you to change your mind, I still have the old plugin that I will continue to enable and use as I need it.

    Plugin Contributor Matt Shaw

    (@mattshaw)

    Thanks Robert, I appreciate that and can see where you’re coming from.

    Just in case you or anyone else reading this is curious- I have a ton of respect for Frank Bültge and all of his plugins. He’s an excellent developer.

    When I named this “Better Search Replace”, it wasn’t targeted directly at his plugin (though in hindsight, I can see how it could be perceived that way). Instead, it was targeted at the majority of search/replace solutions – “better” is of course subjective and this is simply my ideal version of a search/replace plugin/script.

    Anyway, I’ll keep your feedback in mind while I continue to iterate. Thanks again for reconsidering.

Viewing 7 replies - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • The topic ‘Doesn't show results’ is closed to new replies.