Hi @mihaiimagely,
So, when you click on the “Meta” link button, that’s basically either reading the images’ metadata from the database or it tries to read it from the image file itself in case that this data is missing within the database.
This is not quite correct. If everything goes well NGG will show 4 different kinds of data after clicking on the “Meta” link:
- Meta data
- EXIF data
- IPTC data
- XMP data
NGG only stores the first type of data in the database and reads the EXIF, IPTC and XMP data from the image file whenever you click on “Meta”. You can verify this by emptying the meta_data field in table wp1_ngg_pictures for a specific image file and clicking again on the “Meta” Link of that image.
Could you please try performing a test and upload the same image file to NGG a couple of times, then try noticing if clicking on meta will return identical or different results for each of them?
I used 2 different image files for this test and created multiple copies of them, e.g.
image1.jpg > image1a.jpg, image1b.jpg, image1c.jpg
image2.jpg > image2a.jpg, image2b.jpg, image2c.jpg
Each and every copy behaves exactly the same. Although all 6 files have the same meta data, the first set of copies does NOT show IPTC or Copyright data while the second set of copies does.
So the inconsistencies are always the same for a specific image file and this must be related to these image files. My point is that every other Image Manipulation Program does show ALL meta data correctly including EXIF, IPTC, XMP and it is only NGG that fails to do this in a consistent matter.