EXMAGE support for thumbnails

Hi, Unfortunately, our plugin is unable to implement this feature.

Best regards.

Hello,

In fact, the 100*100 size is supported at the moment. At the time of import, if your image is product-123-photo.jpg and an image size product-123-photo.jpg_100x100.jpg exists, it will also be imported.

Currently supported sizes are hardcoded as:

array(
'thumbnail' => 50,
'small1' => 100,
'small2' => 200,
'medium' => 350,
'medium_large' => 640
)

However, we can add a filter hook there for customization purpose in the following updates.

Best regards

Existing support for thumbnails is good news. In my testing, it didn’t work, unfortunately, I provided an URL where the thumbnails were already generated, but EXMAGE didn’t pick it up, it just listed all sizes as original file.

However, inspecting the database, if I edit _wp_attachment_metadata in postmeta table related to the image, and change woocommerce_gallery_thumbnail value from product-123-photo.jpg to product-123-photo-100×100.jpg, then WooCommerce picks it up just fine.

So, for now, I can just run SQL search / replace code to address this issue, and hopefully, you will release a newer version that does it automatically.

Thank you for releasing such a useful plugin!

A new versions has just been released, please update it then add below PHP snippet:

add_filter( 'exmage_get_supported_image_sizes', function ( $image_sizes, $url ) {

	return array(
		'thumbnail'    => 200,
		'medium'       => 350,
		'medium_large' => 640,
	);
}, 10, 2 );

You should also add some condition checks to make sure the $url is from your desired source.

Another comment, I noticed in the database, there are identical values (image file URL) for:

_wp_attached_file
and
_exmage_external_url

Is there a need for _exmage_external_url entry then? It means the wp_postmeta database table will be bigger, and with a lot of images, it could become an issue.

A new version has just been released, please update it then add below PHP snippet:

Yes, the code you provided works for WordPress posts and pages, thank you! For WooCommerce it probably needs to be:

add_filter( 'exmage_get_supported_image_sizes', function ( $image_sizes, $url ) {

	return array(
	'woocommerce_gallery_thumbnail'    => 100,
	'woocommerce_thumbnail'            => 350,
	'woocommerce_single'               => 640,
	);
}, 10, 2 );

Just need to adjust the sizes, in pixels, to match your theme (ex. 100, 350, 640)

Yes, you can adjust the sizes to fit your need.

Is there a need for _exmage_external_url entry then? It means the wp_postmeta database table will be bigger, and with a lot of images, it could become an issue.

Yes, it’s needed for our plugin to detect and treat an image as an external source.

Just to confirm, I looked at the database again and seeing that each image has 2 identical records when using EXMAGE. Is this right or should there only be 1 record (maybe 2 if it’s a duplicate)?

Please advise.

Yes, but they are used for different purposes. _exmage_external_url can just be boolean but we want to store the original url so that it’s possible to switch between external image and local image like this https://snipboard.io/Vx03u6.jpg