777 jili jackpot apk latest version.Claim Your Free 999 Pesos Bonus Today

Reply To: Generate pages from url params

bcworkz — Sun, 16 Jun 2019 13:13:02 +0000

You’ve pretty much described in general what any CMS system does. Take an arbitrary value and show related content. The devil is in the details. How do you relate the arbitrary value to content in the DB? You must do this somehow. In your example, 12345 could be a term ID, a term of some taxonomy. Categories, foobars, whatever. The term is assigned to post content, so you are asking WP to get all content with that term assigned. Content would be kept in the posts table. The usual posts can hold arbitrary content if you are not using them for blogging. Or you can create a new post type. The post type is just another data container you can use for any purpose.

It’s up to you to figure out how that all works with your data. The mechanisms are in place, but it’s up to you to relate content to terms so WP can deliver what you want.

Reply To: Generate pages from url params

floi13 — Sun, 16 Jun 2019 13:41:31 +0000

@bcworkz thanks for your reply.
Haven’t thought of terms; perhaps that’s the way to go for me. If I understand you right it could be something like
– I create a custom posttype
– I create a custom taxonomy for that posttype

I then create a template with a term field and if the id equals 12345, show the content related to that id.

Am I correct so far?

Reply To: Generate pages from url params

bcworkz — Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:08:04 +0000

Yes, I believe so, though the way your phrased the template logic gives me pause. Maybe I’m taking it too literally, but what you said in equivalent code would something like

if ( $_GET['term-id'] == 12345 ) {
   $query = new WP_Query(['my_taxonomy'=> 12345,]);
   if ( $query->has_posts()) do_the_loop();
}

This of course only works for the ID 12345. You want it to work for any valid ID, as in:

if ( isset( $_GET['term-id'])) {
   $query = new WP_Query(['my_taxonomy'=> $_GET['term-id'],]);
   if ( $query->has_posts()) do_the_loop();
}

I’m pretty sure the latter is what you would have done, but the former is literally what you said ??

(the above code would not actually work, its purpose is only to illustrate logic)