Hello,
Sorry for the late reply. The problem with multiple collapsed footnotes is that each instance is expected to link back to the respective referrer, unlike in print where the reader manages on their own jumping back and forth between referrers and footnotes. On the web, bijective links are expected.
To avoid screwing things up, best is to add a unique detail to each note, such as a page number. The ibid. notation is also a great way to collapse footnotes while keeping bijectivity.
As you note, the Footnotes plugin comes with a unique algorithm that requires copy-pasting the exact same note and, if collapsing is active, these will be unified while keeping referrer numbering continuous. That makes clicking the right backlink easy. WikiMedia collapses numbers altogether and enumerates backlinks in small letters while the referrers lack those letters so there is no way of being sure which small letter to click. Just a matter of considering that if even WikiMedia didn’t come up with a solution, how would we.
That said, what are your expectations? Currently you are asking for a way to collapse both numbers and footnotes so that identical footnotes occur only once in the list (which they currently can, see above) and have only one number (which they currently don’t). That would be fine for all identical referrers to link down to a specific footnote. Does your spec include a way of linking back up to a specific referrer?
-
This reply was modified 3 years, 8 months ago by
pewgeuges.