• I was using a different wordpress plugin to display google photos on my website. Since google made the change last month, it made that plugin do weird things. For example the order that the albums are displayed is not correct. It displays them in the order that they’re displayed when I go to photos.google.com which is not correct. I can see no way to change the order of the albums at google photos. Does your plugin allow me to change the order that the albums display?

    Another question – Does your plugin display the captions that I have on my google photos?

    Thank you, I may start using your plugin if it works properly unlike the one I’m using now

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Plugin Author Sayontan Sinha

    (@sayontan)

    It displays them in the order that they’re displayed when I go to photos.google.com which is not correct. I can see no way to change the order of the albums at google photos. Does your plugin allow me to change the order that the albums display?

    This is a limitation with Google’s API rather than any plugin. Google’s API doesn’t allow for any type of sorting. So in that matter Photonic is no different from other plugins.

    Another question – Does your plugin display the captions that I have on my google photos?

    Yes. For future reference, there are multiple linked demos on Photonic’s page right here on www.ads-software.com :)! They do show the whole spectrum of capabilities of the plugin, so feel free to check them out.

    PS: Since this is not a support question I am marking it as such.

    Thread Starter MDC2957

    (@mdc2957)

    Thanks for the reply. Google really dropped the ball with this new API in my opinion. I might look at Flickr or something else. Usually Google makes everything so easy, but this is a mess.

    Plugin Author Sayontan Sinha

    (@sayontan)

    The API is not that bad, but it defies common-sense on several fronts:

    • It gives you short-lived “redirect” URLs, so you cannot cache your HTML output, because the redirect URLs cease to be valid after a point of time.
    • Search by text-strings and sort are not permitted, while every big-name provider offers those.
    • Video support is lame; you cannot play videos in a lightbox with native features, so I had to come up with a workaround.
    • The API query (100 photos or 50 albums in one shot) and rate limits (10,000 calls per day) are among the lowest I have seen.

    The API is easy to code for, though, once you have done the security implementation. It is also a whole lot better than the legacy PicasaWeb API. And then there is also the matter of free storage limits.

    If you are looking for a replacement I would suggest SmugMug, since Flickr put in a 1000 photos limit on its free accounts after it got acquired by SmugMug. SmugMug’s API is pretty solid, and it is good at keeping the number of calls low.

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • The topic ‘Google Photos question’ is closed to new replies.