Horrible non-WYSIWYG Editor
-
I really gave Gutenberg a shot, but it’s just about the worst writing-editing tool I’ve ever seen in my life. It is also the most inflexible editor in the history of mainkind, and it was easier to format in DOS Word.
Even incredibly basic stuff like line spacing is totally broken, and there was no way I could get 2 line breaks between headers no matter how many times I hit “Return” or “Shift-Return” – I even edited in <br> <br> using HTML and Gutenberg deleted the code once I went back to the Visual Editor. What the hell?
Hey guys, ever heard of WYSIWYG? If I want 200 spaces between headers I need to get 200 spaces between headers – instead I get what a pile of “change for the sake of change” nerds decided I should get, which is a hardline piece of bloated crap designed for morons.
Again, WYSIWYG, What You See is What You Get – that is a tenet of web publishing and is impossible to achieve in Gutenberg simply because the “Visual Editor” is exactly the opposite and nothing you see visually will actually turn out that way in the published article.
- The topic ‘Horrible non-WYSIWYG Editor’ is closed to new replies.