• Resolved Nate

    (@goseongguy)


    Hello,

    This is a minor thing but I’ve noticed for the Advanced Column and Section blocks, UAGB by default seems to assign an empty value for the box-shadow property, which the browser flags as invalid CSS. I have tried to “clear” it out in the block editor, but it stays there.

    For example:

    .uagb-block-c4dd8e61.wp-block-uagb-section {
        box-shadow: ;
    }
    
    .uagb-block-1544ab22.wp-block-uagb-columns {
        box-shadow: ;
    }

    I suppose box-shadow: none would be more valid, but ideally the box-shadow rule wouldn’t be there if it’s not defined or has been cleared. It all adds up to less CSS processing the browser has to do anyway, and less inline code.

    Cheers,
    Nate

Viewing 7 replies - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Thread Starter Nate

    (@goseongguy)

    These are additional styles that break validation:

    .uagb-icon-list-repeater{line-height: em;}
    .uagb-icon-list__label{line-height: em;}

    Hello @goseongguy ,

    We’re sorry for the inconvenience caused to you. Also, we are thankful for your patience and readiness to help us fix things that we come across.

    I’d like to let you know, that I have reported this issue to our concerned developers. They have added a task for it and will start work on it. Please lend us some time.
    ?
    Your patience and co-operation are highly appreciated.

    Hello @goseongguy

    I believe this issue has since been solved, please let us know whether you are still replicating it from your end.

    Looking forward to hearing from you.

    Regards
    Judith.

    Thread Starter Nate

    (@goseongguy)

    Hello Judith,

    I am running the latest Astra/UABG, and I just tried adding a new section block to a post with a paragraph block of a few words.

    I still see the invalid CSS on the frontend coming from, in this case, the inline style tag <style id="uagb-style-frontend-5240">

    .uagb-block-8e607718.wp-block-uagb-section{box-shadow: ;}

    If a live URL would be helpful, the issue can also be observed on the following post in the “Index of 33 Old Trees” section.
    https://goseongguy.com/old-trees-of-goseong/

    Cheers,
    Nate

    Hello @goseongguy,

    I would like you to know that Our developers are working on this case and have yet to reach a conclusion. Please do not worry, I will keep this ticket open and will continue to follow up with them. I will update you as soon as I hear from them.

    I appreciate your patience and understanding in this matter. Have a good one!

    Regards.
    Judith.

    Hello @goseongguy,

    Thank you for your patience.

    I have received an update from the developers about the issue that they have added a task to their to-do list and they will be working on this towards a resolution. You can expect a fix in the next update of the Astra theme; however, I am afraid that I do not have a timeline for you as of now.

    I appreciate your patience and understanding in this matter.
    So I’m going to mark this as resolved – if you have any further questions, you can start a new thread.

    Regards,
    Judith.

    Thread Starter Nate

    (@goseongguy)

    That sounds great, thank you.

Viewing 7 replies - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • The topic ‘Invalid empty box-shadow property’ is closed to new replies.