Is discrepancy between webpagetest and AI image a ranking issue?
-
Hi Takis,
thank you for the great plugin.I’m trying to understand if Google assumes that slower full size rather than smaller faster adaptive images are being used on a low traffic site where it does not have real world speed data.
To explain I see a discrepancy between https://webpagetest.org/result which indicates large full size images being served on mobile and chrome dev tools (mobile device option) which indicates, the true picture I believe, much smaller images served via the adaptive images plugin.
I was hoping webpagetest.org would show the page serving the AI image but it doesn’t – maybe because it is reading the HTML I’m not sure.
For this site it seems that there is not enough real world data for Google to use in it’s ranking algorithm i.e. message
‘Chrome User Experience Report does not have sufficient real-world speed data for this page’
So I’m now left wondering how Google will determine page speed for the purpose of ranking.
If Google does not have real world speed data, is it using the pagespeed insights/webpagetest.org approach of reading html which is blind to the use of the adaptive image sized version? Could this account for poor ranking?
I would be grateful if you could share any insight.
Thank you
PeteThe page I need help with: [log in to see the link]
- The topic ‘Is discrepancy between webpagetest and AI image a ranking issue?’ is closed to new replies.