Max Thrane’s CyberSpace

@ nsxpower
That looks very clean and slick, I like the way it is ?? I can nearly tell by now if some site belongs to Mac user or not :p and I definetely see Mac influence on your site ?? I gotta work a bit on my comments template, that’s for sure…

Thanks.
Your commets look fine (I just have a personal dislike [with passion] of graphical smileys).

Sorry the link does not seem to work externally. Hopefully
this will.
That is the FF shot.

Only 2:47am ?? I don’t mind smiley, I just think the graphical ones are a little on the annoying side.
There was a discussion on the alternating comment backgrounds a few days ago, so just search. I used to use ALA’s solution, but there is an embarassingly simple way to do it.
@anon: That FF screenshot does not have a background. i/ieCapture sometimes does not have the time to load everything. This one has the background in place.

@ nsxpower
I’ld be glad if you could point me at that “embarassingly simple” way. And I’m off for today, zzz time.

OK. That very fine browser tool can be slow and it does seem to deliver the
screen shot before the page renders fully which kind of defeats the whole object. I do not know if you saw all the others but some of them were clearly scrambled
in their layout. And my own FF is still not showing it anything like correctly.

https://www.ads-software.com/support/10/1148

@ Anonymous
IE 5.0 does not render it correctly, I don’t care really much about 5.x, even 6.0 is over 2 years old. In our industry with progress we’ve got this age means really alot. And I recommend you to update your FF or go back to IE or something, please stop bugging here ?? Thank you. It seems that it works for others, it works for me, if someone can’t see it how it should be, well… I’m not a tech.support ??
@ nsxpower
Thank you a lot ?? I’ll take a look at it.

And in *your industry* your accessibility is what? Do you ever read anything?

Well MaxT that would be fine and dandy if the CSS was in fact valid, but it does not seem to be. No dialogue about browser performance makes much sense if the code is not valid to start with. Hence the dialogue here which has been of the Gee Brad everything seems cool here, variety. I am sure it is an oversight on your part. There does not seem much point in posting a url and then complaining about the feedback. If you are not in the mood to talk, then heck; as Hillary Clinton would say, don’t post.

ur poll breaks from inside a post link… use absolute links i suggest.

Uhm… not quite following you, Sushubh, could you please provide more information and if possible some screenshots? Thank you.

try polling from a link like this:
https://www.maxt.dk/archives/2004/05/01/wordpress-12-is-out/
it tries to access the index file in that folder which apparently does not exist. ??

the header image is misaligned in opera.
but then opera is something not many will be concerned with…

Well forgive me but goodies or not the badge on your site states CSS 2. The on hover says something else. But the link is to CSS 2 I think and it wont validate.
Those are not goodies. It is, at least in validation terms, a mess. Why not simply validate to CSS 3? Or does it not do that either? This is not to be pedantic. But when you come to this forum, people like myself who are willing to spend 5 minutes on someone else’s problem check the validation first. Until it all validates any amount of *Gee Brad looks cool* is a waste of time. We still do not know what specification in terms of validation your site is meant to be at. So in summary when we started out you had a broken xhtml link, non validating CSS, and no legacy browsers hacks. What do want? A design award?