Misleading rule description

  • Resolved stlpl

    (@stlpl)


    3 months ago

    I may be missing something, since English is not my first language, but I think that You are using the term “ancestor” in the restriction editor incorrectly. I think You should use “descendant”.

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • Plugin Author Daniel Iser

    (@danieliser)

    @stlpl – In this case we stuck with WordPress’s own labeling of this relationship.

    There is no concept of a descendant within WP page relationship, functions or documentation even.

    It should probably read “Content Has An Ancestor in Selected Pages”.

    This is the specific function used when checking that rule, so you can see where it got the label from https://developer.www.ads-software.com/reference/functions/get_ancestors/

    We could simply rename it Descendent, but our concern is diverging from known WP concepts in ways that lead to their own confusion.

    Will consider it.

    Thanks for the feedback.

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.