nav-below too high and overlap post in home

Site link?

Sorry

https://lascronicasdeasghon.com/

Thanks

Not seeing the problem. Can you point me at a specific item?

Well. You can see that the three first post titles are links, and you can click them to go to that post. OK.

In the forth post, yo pass th mouse trough the title, and the hand don’t appears and you can’t click it. You can click the image (if it has it) or in the counter of comments, but in the title not.

If you make right click in the title and inspect the element, you will see that firefox shows the h3 of nav-below.

Thus, the nav-below is too tall, and overlaps the content of the post.

Try adding this to your custom css or your child theme style.css

#nav-below {
    float: left;
    width: 100%;
}

Post-490 seems to be the problem. In Firebug, if you hover over the <article> it spans 2 x posts which is hiding the anchor.

Can’t see anything obvious, I’ll flag to @d4z to take a look. (He already has!!)

Ops, I see what happens.. you have this weird issue. ??
Look at your article 2 (for example):

<article id="post-493" class="post-493 post type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-pathfinder tag-aventuras tag-pathfinder-en-espanol tag-sociedad-pathfinder row-fluid hover">

You see that “tag-pathfinder-en-espanol”? That matches this rule in customizr css:

@media (min-width: 1200px){
[class*="span"] {
float: left;
min-height: 1px;
margin-left: 30px;
}
}

And so on. That’s cause that an other issue..

@nikeo:
oddity ??

Oh my god…

Then I can`t use ‘espa?ol’ (I’m spanish) in my posts?

I don’t know why the tags are used in the class property of the DOM. It has no sense for me.

This is very frustrating, I’ll see what I do…

Mmm .. There’s a simple solution to continue use those tags, but just replace “espanol” in article selectors.
Put this in your child theme functions.php

add_filter('tc_article_selectors', 'avoid_span');
function avoid_span($article_selectors){
    return str_replace('espanol','espa_nol', $article_selectors);
}

And then I think you could also get rid of the css rule I gave you above.

thanks