• I’m just wondering if, when I download 1.5 at this point, whether it’s better to get the official release or the latest nightly. I am assuming that there may be few tiny bugs in the official Strayhorn that are ironed out in the nightly versions of WordPress 1.5, or have the nightlies already taken off towards 2.0 (thus making them less stable)?

    Thanks and, as always, keep up the fabulous work!

Viewing 2 replies - 31 through 32 (of 32 total)
  • Putting a reminder on the download page letting users know that they *must* run /wp-admin/upgrade.php when installing v1.5 over *any* previous release is a good idea.

    Even though I’ve been programming for 22 years, I *still* look at files named readme or installinfo or other such things, just in case there’s something goofy I need to be aware of. Particularly with Windows (my server is a Windows machine), goofy is the rule, not the exception.

    If you’re going to skip reading the included documentation, especially files named readme or important or whatever, do *not* complain about it. It would have taken you all of 10 seconds to skim to the “Upgrading” section and see the 4 steps required (if you include “Done!” as a step).

    In any case, it seems that people willing to complain about something are not, in general, the same people willing to do something about it. You have definitely done the former, and in the thread at least, started a bit of the latter.

    Take a little time to create a userpage on the Codex for yourself (yes, we already know that the Codex software is not particularly well documented – but it’s not all that tricksy either) and start contributing. If you can’t contribute, don’t complain either. Offer constructive suggestions (which you have done as well), and perhaps someone else will do it (the mantra of complainers everywhere).

    come on macmanx, you know better:

    experimental psychology tells us the average human is mostly blind to details he is not specifically looking for. thus, users never have, never do, and never will read instructions. they only become interested in docs and instructions when they experience problems, and they usually don’t spot them when not actively looking for them. hence, the importance of contextual docs.

    moreover, users seldom look for docs at the right place because the average human spontaneously asks a person when he runs into problems (e.g. when you start looking for a new supplier, you ask your contacts first). hence, the suggested bold links before the download button and in the forum. it is the extra step that might make a user aware docs exist in the first place.

    regarding the security issue, i’d appreciate if you enlightened me, because i see no obvious security holes here: you can review the upgrade.php code before opting to upload it to your blog. and from where i’m standing, resulting potential security holes looks very much like an arbitrary “machine is clueless, so user is in charge of choosing the best defaults” position. if it is, i’m afraid the later is irreconcilable with my “user wants to stay clueless, so machine is in charge of choosing the best defaults” position, so i’d rather not turn this constructive thread into a sterile debate.

    anyway… i’ve to admit i’m just an average, clueless, originally irritated newbie that does not read readme files. and my contribution to wordpress, today, is the time i spent giving a few hopefully constructive suggestions here and elsewhere that i think could streamline wordpress, its docs and its support workflow.

    from there, you are just as free to ignore said suggestions entirely on grounds they were not worth the time you spent reading them, as you are free to read more such suggestions by subscribing to my blog’s columns, which occasionally deal with usability and wordpress, among various other topics. ??

    thanks for your time — Denis

Viewing 2 replies - 31 through 32 (of 32 total)
  • The topic ‘Nightly or Stable?’ is closed to new replies.