Super cache -vs- 1 Blog Cacher

  • rage00001

    (@rage00001)


    16 years ago

    I have tried for several days to get the Super cache plugin to work.
    As you can see in this topic, i was quite desperate.

    Well.. in my search for an answer i found another chache plugin called 1 Blog Cacher.

    I installed this in like 1 minute, it was just plug and play like most plugins are, and wtf.. it really worked!!

    <!– Loaded originally in 0.76 seconds (2008-11-06, 17:15:41). –>
    <!– Loaded from cache in 0.0045 seconds by 1 Blog Cacher – (2008-11-06, 17:16:09) –>

    My question is then, what is the difference between “WP-Super Cache” and “1 Blog Cacher”, and why did this work so easily…

    Should i unplug it and try to get super cache to work, or should i just be happy and go drink a bear in the bar…

    I can live with a loading time 0.0045 seconds if that’s the question…

    PS: sorry for the doble posts, but for one reson the tags are not saved.

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

  • wp-super-cache can serve cached files without executing PHP, I don’t think 1 blog cacher can. Not sure if 1 blog cacher does any mutex/file locking of the cache generation.

    Use whatever works for you!

    smoothmoniker

    (@smoothmoniker)

    … go drink a bear in the bar …

    If you do end up drinking a bear in a bar, please upload photos! That’s something I’d pay good money to see.

    Thread Starter rage00001

    (@rage00001)

    HAHHAHA…

    Yea.. if i would survive that is…. dohh..

    iLoveWP

    (@bikeshake)

    Sorry for the off topic, but that bear typo made me laugh really hard! And my wife, too. And our kid, too, who doesn’t know what a beer is, but laughed because we were laughing.
    Thanks for making the typo, Rage00001!

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The topic ‘Super cache -vs- 1 Blog Cacher’ is closed to new replies.

Tags