• Resolved Hasse

    (@hassesthlm)


    I wonder how big the difference is between this plugin and different SSR solutions? Is there a comparison guide between this and other free plugins such as “Simply Static” that also create static HTML pages?

    • This topic was modified 2 years, 6 months ago by Hasse.
Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • Plugin Contributor Mark (a11n)

    (@thingalon)

    Hi @hassesthlm,

    I’m afraid I’m not familiar with Simply Static, so I can’t comment on that plugin specifically.

    However, I can describe the difference between a static site generator (like Simply Static), and a caching plugin (like WP Super Cache).

    Caching plugins don’t change the way your site works. The first time a user visits any page on your site, a copy of its HTML is saved and served to the next visitors until the HTML needs to be regenerated.

    Caching plugins (including WP Super Cache) can be configured to pre-generate all of the pages on your site, too – so that visitors to your site will almost always be served a quick pre-generated page.

    On the other hand, site generators like Simply Static generate a whole copy of your site as a directory full of HTML files, which can be served to your users without running WordPress at all.

    As a general rule, I would recommend caching for almost any WordPress site, as it can improve the performance without altering the way it works. Static pre-generation can work for some sites, but I would not recommend it for any site with e-commerce, user accounts, or dynamic content that relies on communicating with the server.

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • The topic ‘Plugins vs SSR’ is closed to new replies.