Hi Jeff,
So sorry I didn’t get back to you sooner! I had a very busy week that kept me away from the Forums.
I was finally able to took a look at your code, and I didn’t see any errors in there that could generate the kind of behavior you described with your stats (other than the duplicated code, which you already took care of). Are you still experiencing the issue?
On another note, I did notice some minor html errors while I was looking at your code, so I ran your page through the W3C html validator, and here are the results I obtained. Don’t freak out over the amount of errors: less than 100 is pretty standard with the Validator. Besides, it is usually way less than the number indicated (between 30 to 50% less, depending on the case), because certain broken or incorrect tags lead the Validator to “find” other errors that are not really errors, and that disappear after you fix the actual ones. Even though I am not a programmer (yeah, the disclaimer, haha), I agree with all the folks that think that W3C validation is a BIG deal and that it can improve your SEO, so I suggest you take a look (or have someone take a look) at those.
Let me know how it goes. Good luck!
M
P.S.: About your last post, luckily for you, nobody can actually change stuff around in your blog other than you (and hackers, of course, haha), but most browsers have a feature that let’s users look at webpage codes. That’s how I inspected yours, ??