smush.it already run, considering ewww

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Plugin Author nosilver4u

    (@nosilver4u)

    If you’ve used their Super Smush feature on an image, I would avoid using EWWW’s lossy option on the same images, as the quality will further degrade (not much, but some). If you’re just using lossless and you want to squeeze a few more bytes out of your images, go ahead and re-optimize them.

    Thread Starter pleeman

    (@pleeman)

    Thanks for the quick reply. I did not use “Super Smush”, so maybe I will give it a shot with EWWW.

    Plugin Author nosilver4u

    (@nosilver4u)

    Yeah, I would definitely try out the lossy compression on a few images, just to see what you think. You can also use the web-uploaders at tinypng.com and/or jpegmini.com (fast mode) if you want to try it out without altering your existing images.

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • The topic ‘smush.it already run, considering ewww’ is closed to new replies.