Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Plugin Author deip

    (@deip)

    Hi Bjarne,

    We have taken a note of it and will change the attributes in next major update if worthy. Because those attributes are very important in the code and crucial. Changing the name is very easy, but requires heavy testing cause those attributes are main components.

    Since these are not errors, but some standards, attribute naming conventions, we have give this a low priority. There are lots of feature and fine tuning that have high priority than this. This name of attributes has a huge testing overhead.

    Its a design mistake we made and we have it as it is, cause its not causing any harm.

    Thanks for your time to have a look into our plugin,

    Cheers,
    Deepak

    Thread Starter Bjarne Oldrup

    (@oldrup)

    Thanks for the clarification! As an old developer, I’m aware of the consequences of changing those attribute names, so I totally understand your approach, and some “cosmetic” html errors that browsers, in this case, ignore anyway, is not stopping me from using and recommending dFlip 3D ??

    My main intention with this, was not to stress you with validation tests, but rather to share my experience, with dFlip 3D flipbook in a WordPress 5.5 RC environment – which is good ??

    Best regards
    Bjarne

    Plugin Author deip

    (@deip)

    No Problem @oldrup ,
    You are just doing your part.

    You had notified about this before too and we had a note. If possible we will implement this too. ??

    Have a good day,
    Deepak

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • The topic ‘Tested fine with WordPress 5.5 RC1 – a few HTML errors still’ is closed to new replies.