This plugin and SEO Framework

EME overrides that description per event with its own meta-tag. So maybe you should try to make sure the SEO framework doesn’t interfere there …

Sure, the question is how? There is no option for that.

Maybe i should ask the SEO plugin developer.

I think the seo framework filter to bypass is the_seo_framework_description_output. I’ll add that to the faq too
Edit: FAQ adapted (hope it works ?? )

• This reply was modified 4 years, 2 months ago by Franky.

I will have to test this next WE and update here.

Well, the

“add_filter (‘the_seo_framework_description_output’, ’eme_seo_framework_filter’);”

part doesn’t seem to work. SEO Framework continues to put out the wrong page description.

Sorry, then it is a question for that plugin I suppose … you did use the complete example I hope? I renamed the function reference so …

• This reply was modified 4 years, 2 months ago by Franky.

Sure, i already asked them and wait.

Yes i used the full functions.

If anybody needs to do that, this is the way to totally disable SEO Framework from EME.

In the below example you need to find and replace the PAGE ID.

add_filter( 'the_seo_framework_query_supports_seo', function( $supported ) {

	$tsf = the_seo_framework();

	// This TSF method also works in the admin area, and prevents ID collision with terms.
	if ( $tsf->is_singular() ) {

		// Define your excluded page IDs here.
		$excluded_ids = [ 42, 9001 ];

		// This TSF method supports page-as-archive pages, like blog and shop pages.
		if ( in_array( $tsf->get_the_real_ID(), $excluded_ids, true ) ) {
			$supported = false;
		}
	}

	return $supported;
} );

Thanks, I updated the faq. Maybe it would work like this too?

add_filter( 'the_seo_framework_query_supports_seo', function( $supported ) {
	if (eme_is_single_event_page() || eme_is_single_location_page()) {
			$supported = false;
	}
	return $supported;
} );

But I’ll leave that up to you for testing ??

Yes that also seems to work.

What of the two shall i use?

(the first code was posted by the SEO Frameworks devs).

By the looks of it, I’d say that the latter is more efficient, but you can always add php timings at the beginning and at the end of the function to see what is more efficient in timing to be sure ??