360fun

Yes, I was already talking about the carousel mode, that’s where I would like to be able to select an option “Center Image” in the “Click Event” menu. In order to simulate the behaviour of the carousel in my link.

That would be great! Please let me know what’s their response, I really need this feature asap. Thank you!

What “Pro feature”? This is the normal editor of the basic free version: anybody can use it.

https://elementor.com/help/text-editor-widget/

Wow, super efficient! ??

In my case I’ve also changed size of the avatar through CSS, I don’t know if that’s also something you find interesting to add.

Actually I think is “Header text color” but the link doesn’t inherit that color so must be forced.

.header__name {
color: inherit !important;
}

Awesome, thanks! ?? The only thing missing is the ability to change the title color but I did it with CSS:

.header__name {
color: #fff !important;
}

Might be useful for less technical people! ??

Too late ??

I updated the code, so I can add ‘manage_links’ capability to any user, but the code is a bit dirty:

$user = wp_get_current_user();
$caps = $user->allcaps;

//if( $user->has_cap(‘manage_links’) ) { // doesn’t work…no idea why
if( !empty( $caps[‘manage_links’] ) ) {
add_filter(‘linky_submenu_links_page_capalibilty’, function($capability) {
$user = wp_get_current_user();
$roles = ( array ) $user->roles;
return $roles[0];
});
}

If you could clean it and implement it in the next release, would be great! ??

Yeah, thanks! ??

I don’t want to gift a course myself, I want to make customers able to BUY a course not for themselves but for someone else (a GIFT to someone) without any admin intervention. If a gift a course there’s no automated way to make the customer pay for it…

Too fast ?? There’s a bug: in this way admins cannot see “links” page ??

I fixed it with:

if ( !current_user_can( ‘manage_options’ ) ) {
add_filter(‘linky_submenu_links_page_capalibilty’, function($capability) {
return ‘editor’;
});
}

Awesome, thank you! ??

I think we’re just not understanding each other.

If i read a phrase like “I am sorry to tell you this, but no… ” and I see “? Resolved” in the thread, I feel the conversation from your side is 100% closed. A digital wall on my face.

I came here with a problem because I saw an opportunity to help improving a tool used by hundreds of people, but I leave with no hope to do so. This is how I feel.

I 100% understand that you are just replacing the GM APIs, and that’s why I also opened a thread in EM support: https://www.ads-software.com/support/topic/improve-map-and-search-address-ui-ux/

Anyway the code that is generating the UI it’s yours, and nothing stops you to change it a bit: could also be a way to show a slight different approach and help improving the original one. I collaborate in several open source projects and this is the scope of open source: make software better for everyone.

When you say “A live address search…” I understand that my mockup failed to show you the idea I’ve my mind: there’s no “live” search. I just changed the position of the elements, not the mechanic, this in fact **reduces the mistakes** of the user and so **reduces the API calls**. Definitely not opposite.

When the user types doesn’t call the OSM API but calls the local DB (like does now): if the location is there, won’t be needed to “search”. Because when the user see the data filled, there’s no reason to hit “Search Address”.

You want to be 100% sure? Just clean the search field.
People nowadays are used to an interface that shows “suggestions”: they are basically everywhere.

Of course if you just want to copy 1:1 what EM UI/UX does, this conversation is over… I’ll make my changes locally and that’s it.

https://www.ads-software.com/support/topic/improve-map-and-search-address-ui-ux/

Every EM location on your website has been saved to your database when a new Event has been submitted.

I 100% know how it works…but we just started using it in this website so the location table is basically empty. Plus we have users sending events from the entire country (if was just a region or a city was different). As I wrote before, events are 99% in places not recorder in the DB and it will be like this for a looong time before users will re-use some locations.

Which bring us to the main problem: the first time that somebody has to enter the address gets frustrated and don’t do it. This is a real life scenario, I cannot change it, just improve the UI/UX, not the mind of the users.

Sincerely, as a dev/designer myself, it’s a pity to see hard work not used and no way to collaborate to improve it. I can fix the UI with some JS/CSS/PHP tricks but other people will have the same problems…

I’ll might try to reach the devs of Events Manager, let’s see, but OSM is making more difficult than GMaps to find an address: so that doesn’t affect their users.

What would be great is to integrate your plugin and give both options, did you try to propose that?