anotherhero
Forum Replies Created
-
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Plugin: Web Optimizer] why chose to promote hyper cache?@ovidiu: we will prepare comparsion of different WordPress plugins (features / results). But you know it will take a bit of time…
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Plugin: Web Optimizer] What are actual results?@enduserthing: please you can check results for different websites and design layouts here
https://code.google.com/p/web-optimizator/w/listForum: Plugins
In reply to: [Plugin: Web Optimizer] Blank pages, even on a fresh installation.Guys, we have debug version of this plugin here
https://web-optimizator.googlecode.com/svn/trunk-wordpress/web.optimizer.wordpress.debug.phpPlease try to install it and send me content of /web.optimizer.debug.txt from your website root. This will help to resolve these issues
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Plugin: Web Optimizer] need more details for configration@xinfo: CSS was included inside the PHP
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Plugin: Web Optimizer] getting PHP fatal errors@ovidiu: can you please set all 3 cache directories (CSS/JS/HTML) on Web Optimizer Settings page to
/var/www/clients/client1/web7/web/wp-content/plugins/web-optimizer/cache/
Web Optimizer directory (also there) to
/var/www/clients/client1/web7/web/wp-content/plugins/web-optimizer/
and document root (is this actually root?) to
/var/www/clients/client1/web7/web/It seems automatic calculation of directories won’t work in suPHP case. We will try to pathc plugin for this king of environment.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Plugin: Web Optimizer] getting PHP fatal errors@jdembowski: code was initially under MIT license. It seems free functions will be returned to MIT in a few monthes (when we completely separate paid part from free one).
@ovidiu: there is ‘blank screen’ trouble on several environments, on a few it was fixed with 0.6.0.1 release. What version have you tried?
We are going to release debug edition to get Web Optimizer logs and make it workable on environments that we can’t cover by current test system.
$99 is only for a full version, free version now is more powerfull that PHP Speedy (but maybe covered another part of known systems). And we are improving it every day, every hour.
If you could help us to improve Web Optimizer we can make this amazing tool functioned for you.Of course it’s not compatible (or it can lead to seriuos misfunctions) with PHP Speedy. But you don’t install Super-Cache and Hyper-Cache plugins on the same blog, do you?
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Plugin: Web Optimizer] getting PHP fatal errorsI think, here are all instructions to get suPHP work with paths
https://www.howtoforge.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-29617.html
there is a re-compilation way and some info about modulesForum: Plugins
In reply to: [Plugin: Web Optimizer] Blank pages, even on a fresh installation.knichol, thx for investigation. I’ve made a fix to prevent
set_options
issue in the future.A lot of issues are located in communication between WP plugin and Web Optimizer core. I think that active testing from WP community can help in their elimination. So I will be grateful for any bug reports.
Forum: Everything else WordPress
In reply to: Predefined WordPress packages+ I suppose ‘Will be good with…’ feature with plugin suggestion can make sense.
I also think such a resource must be fully automatized, and it won’t need any sufficient time to support.
Forum: Everything else WordPress
In reply to: Predefined WordPress packagesok, I understand the issue: number of coincedences among WP users will be quite small to provide any sufficient gain with packaged version, right?
You are right – this approach seems not to work. Maybe just large configuration list with top plugins divided into categories, so user can select from 10-20 categories and 100-200 plugins…
Forum: Everything else WordPress
In reply to: Predefined WordPress packagesLaw is relevant for any large fractions (large enough). If we speak about 10% or users which can use pre-defined sets of plugins – it’s a very big number. If you’d like to cover thousands of plugins with 10k- downloads (not top100), obviously you will be right – this idea won’t work for them. But I’m not talking about latter cases.
Forum: Everything else WordPress
In reply to: Predefined WordPress packages@michael: You are right, but statiscally every 10% (for example) of users use such plugin. And for every plugin we will have use rate almost the same (maybe 1,5-2 times different, but it’s not the case). So if plugin is very popular (by downloads) it must be very popular by usage.
It’s also connected to the law of large numbers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_large_numbersForum: Everything else WordPress
In reply to: Predefined WordPress packagesok. But if we analyze stats of plugins usage — we see, that 10% WordPress blogs use 1 plugin, 9% — the other, 7% — the third, and 3% — all these plugins. So we can statistically define such sets of plugins, this will surely make life of starting bloggers easier.
Or maybe there can be created a download wizard, i.e. as for jQuery UI
https://jqueryui.com/downloadForum: Plugins
In reply to: [Plugin: Web Optimizer] getting PHP fatal errorsI think it’s suPhp-related (with rights/paths) issue. From here
https://www.howtoforge.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-29617.html
…
Fatal error: Class ‘Mail’ not found in /var/www/web2/web/test.php on line 56
…
Please make sure that the file Mail.php exists in this directory: /var/www/web2/web/
Files from outside the web root can not be included for security reasons under suphp. The pear documentation includes instructions on how to install pear in a specific local directory.
…
What’s the output of updatedb
locate Mail.php?
…
usr/share/php/Mail.php
…
Add /usr/share/php to your php.ini’s include_path.
…Please write here whether you are successed in installation.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Plugin: Web Optimizer] doesn’t work@xinfo: what is the URL of the broken image? (just to understand what is wrong with it)