datformatiebv

Ah okay, thanks for your explanation and support!

rgds

Trying to fully understand. This was the payload on “POST” to create review:

  var postData = {
    content: payloadObject.response.payload["Entrée du livre d'or"],
    rating: payloadObject.response.payload["Comment évaluez-vous votre séjour"],
    title: payloadObject.response.payload["Villa expérience one-liner"],
    // 'assigned_posts': payloadObject["Name of property occupied"],
    name: payloadObject.response.payload["Nom"],
    date: villaNameTimestamp,
    api: true,
    assigned_posts: postIdFound
  };

Worked fine with “Require Approval” set to “unapproved”yes”

Now is_approved : 0 is required to create unapproved review.

  var postData = {
    content: payloadObject.response.payload["Entrée du livre d'or"],
    rating: payloadObject.response.payload["Comment évaluez-vous votre séjour"],
    title: payloadObject.response.payload["Villa expérience one-liner"],
    // 'assigned_posts': payloadObject["Name of property occupied"],
    name: payloadObject.response.payload["Nom"],
    date: villaNameTimestamp,
    api: true,
    assigned_posts: postIdFound,
    is_approved : 0
  };

So I guess we would like to know when the “is_approved” parameter was introduced.

Thank you , that solved the issue.

However:

• In what release was this implemented,
• what is the purpose of the “Require Approval For” configuration

update:

[PLUGIN DETAILS]
Console Level……………………… : INFO (1)
Console Size………………………. : 375 KB
Database Version…………………… : 1.2
Last Migration Run…………………. : 2023-06-09 19:31:33
Merged Assets……………………… : No
Network Activated………………….. : No
Version…………………………… : 6.9.5 (5.13.2)

behaviour unchanged

tried disabeling excerpts, and this work but also sucks…. Will find a resolution to load site review script in other place than footer. Thanks for the assitance.

Did you edit you last post?

below is my reply to that one….

Gemini Labs wrote:

Is this a WordPress website? It doesn’t look like it.

Post Link: https://www.ads-software.com/support/topic/no-show-more/#post-16809079

Tagmanger is used to inject the modal code (in third party no WP website) that in turn opens a iframe to the WP website with site reviews.

• This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by datformatiebv.
• This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by datformatiebv.

Thanks.

Using Sweetalert2

GETTING:

Uncaught ReferenceError: GLSR is not defined <anonymous> debugger eval code:2debugger eval code:2:1 <anonymous> debugger eval code:2

done no chache => stil no “show more…”

[site_reviews_summary assigned_posts=”post_id” id=”dfReviewsSummaryId” class=”dfReviewsSummaryClass” hide=”bars,rating” schema=”true”]

[site_reviews assigned_posts=”post_id” id=”post_id” class=”dfReviewsSummaryClass” display=”100″ fallback=”Currently there are no reviews for this villa”]

[PLUGIN DETAILS] Console Level……………………… : INFO (1) Console Size………………………. : 374 KB Database Version…………………… : 1.2 Last Migration Run…………………. : 2023-06-09 19:31:33 Merged Assets……………………… : No Network Activated………………….. : No Version…………………………… : 6.9.4 (5.13.2) [REVIEW DETAILS] Reviews…………………………… : 428 (publish: 387, pending: 23, private: 18) Type: local……………………….. : 387 (0, 0, 0, 1, 26, 360)

Issue seems to be related to incorrectly imported CPT’s in a multi-language WPML WP instance.

WMPL dev have provided workaround and are further investigating incident reported for permanent resolution.

Import of site-reviews (using the Import Third Party Reviews method”) worked as designed after application of workaround.

The method described partly works. There are some fields that are not imported correctly however.
We have abandoned this approach for now and attempted to create the Reviews using the API but also there we run into problems. (we will start an separate thread for that)

Hi, we currently have 632 reviews and 310 villas. Moreover: villas contain (but not all) multiple review referrences. (one-to-many)

In WP A:
wp_glsr_ratings: 644
wp_glsr_assigned_users: null
wp_glsr_assigned_terms: 209
wp_glsr_assigned_posts: 516

Right, your last sentence is where we believe it is going wrong. When importing the posts the Post ID’s are not equal in WP B to the ones in WP A.

We were unable to find a method of assuring (or forcing) the post ID’s in WPA and WP B to be the same after the import.

Any direction / hints are welcome.

Hi There, tried to do the following:

in WP A:
wp tools export Reviews (=expWPAReviews)
wp tools export iLodge Villas (custom posts of type:ilodgevilla) (=expWPAV)

in WP B:
delete all Reviews,
delete all Posts (in my case custom posts of type:ilodgevilla)

import expWPAReviews,
import expWPAV

Result in WP B:
all Reviews loaded,
all Posts (of type:ilodgevilla) loaded (however with postID unequal to postID in WP A)
table wp_glsr_assigned_posts = empty so no link between Review and Post(s) exist.

you wrote:
“Site Reviews takes care of the assignments automatically when using those tools.”

What step did we omit or did we execute in wrong sequence?

• This reply was modified 2 years, 11 months ago by datformatiebv.
• This reply was modified 2 years, 11 months ago by datformatiebv.

re required:
Rating field is ticked but still I am able to approve with 0-star ratings.

re summary:
sure… What about:

3.5 out of 5 stars (based on 4 reviews and 2 ratings)

or may be better:

Average rating 3.5

The visitors can see the rating consists of 5 stars anyway.
The question is what is more important to the visitor, the Average rating number or the data used to compose the Average rating number.

In any case, is it possible to customise this text? I can then leave it up to the customer how it will be presented.

Ah I just noticed your rating required note: I have not seen that it is a param that can be set….
Where can this be set?
Thanks for signalling this..

• This reply was modified 2 years, 12 months ago by datformatiebv.