David Cavins

Hi, I don’t really have a favorite. There are so many WP email-improvers that all seem to work ok–it’s more a matter of which features you like. For instance, the deliverability of basic WP emails (because they’re sent from a random, anonymous server, has nothing to do with the WP code) is poor unless you add some important DNS records that help “verify” your sent emails. So, if you’re working on emails, I’d consider using one of the plugins that improves deliverability, too, by sending emails using SMTP or adding the important headers.

Hi, sorry, there’s not an easy way to change this behavior.

Hi, the email is sent by WordPress, so any of the plugins or techniques that are used to style WP’s emails will also change the email you are trying to change. There are tons of options, so the hardest part may be choosing one. ??

Hmm. If the doc is protected, the request has to pass through WP (because the file can’t be directly downloaded) so will be recorded in normal stats apps. If you want to track direct downloads, I think that a plugin like this can do that for you: https://www.ads-software.com/plugins/simple-download-monitor/

Hi,

Any statistics service (Google Analytics, Jetpack) will be able to tell you how many times each doc has been visited. (Each doc has a unique URL, which is what stats services track.)

-David

Hi, sorry, we haven’t built in any download functionality. I’m not sure what download format would be useful, truthfully. If you have an opinion, please let us know, though I can’t promise we’ll build this capability into the plugin.

Like: PDF + a ZIP of associated files? A Word doc + a ZIP of associated files? Just the doc content (the users can grab the attachments separately)?

The issue I foresee is that converting content to a PDF or a Word doc generally requires setting up paid-for conversion software on your server, and that would put it beyond the technical reach of most users.

Thanks!

Thanks, Boone! I was just starting to work backwards into the Astra archive view, and the theme is fairly complicated to follow. I’m glad you found the issue. ??

Hi, yes, that is really broken. Astra for some reason isn’t respecting the archive view for BP Docs (it’s not using the provided template parts). Single docs can be viewed and even edited, but the archive section (seeing the docs library and creating new docs) is totally steamrolled by the theme.

I’ll look more into it if time allows but I don’t want to offer false hope–I don’t have a ton of time for troubleshooting themes.

Thanks!

Great! ??

Hi Philippe,

Use the front-end editor and look for the “Groups” meta box below the content section. If you don’t see a groups meta box, make sure that groups are enabled in BuddyPress.

Closing because this is a duplicate of https://github.com/boonebgorges/buddypress-docs/issues/752

That’s a great finding. Thanks for doing the testing. It sounds like Woo is filtering user capabilities in a too-broad way. I’ll have to open WC and see if it’s obvious what they’re doing.

It sounds to me like you don’t actually want tags (which are crowd sourced and kind of fuzzy), you want a stricter category-like taxonomy. Try using this plugin to associate a new taxonomy with BP Docs: https://github.com/dcavins/bp-docs-taxonomies/tree/master

You’ll need to create the new taxonomy using another plugin. In the above plugin’s readme I suggest a plugin for that.

Sure, you can change the user’s navigation menu using BuddyPress’s nav menu API: https://codex.buddypress.org/developer/navigation-api/

Hi @azzuwayed Thanks for the screenshots. Yes, BP Docs use dynamic permissions, which is why they’re not set up in the same way as other plugins. For instance, by default, any logged-in user can create a document, but a user must belong to a group to associate a document with it. When a doc is created, the document author can choose who can read and edit the doc, so each doc essentially has its own set of permissions.

We do not recommend creating documents from the WP Admin area, as they will not necessarily receive the meta and taxonomy terms they need to function properly.

Thanks for your explanation of the issue! I had no idea what this other plugin is attempting to do.