Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 40 total)
  • Thread Starter DjPD

    (@djpd)

    Yes, 4 years is already long.
    But the plugin is quite good and normal one would not suspect that it goes so strong into the system that it would be security relevant. But you just do not know.

    That’s why I would be interested in whether one rather advises not to continue to use the plugin or if one says that one can not use it at all.
    It would be a shame if you did not use it, but safety is paramount.

    So, what do you say.

    Is the plugin safe and can it still be used or is it no longer safe after such a long time and you guessed that the plugin should be used?
    What do the developers say?

    Thread Starter DjPD

    (@djpd)

    Thank you for your feedback.
    If there are no security issues, that’s exactly what I wanted to hear. ??
    I’m glad because the plugin is really good and pretty easy.
    Greetings, Dj

    P.S.: Of course, I’m also looking forward to the update. ??

    Thread Starter DjPD

    (@djpd)

    Hi Yordan,
    many thanks for your response.

    If Really Simple Captcha and ReCaptcha v3 work together, then it would be enough for me.
    I just wanted to make sure and ask. Not that ReCaptcha will not work if you have Really Simple Captcha installed too.

    I always remember to take files from old versions, because they are overwritten with every update and you never know whether the recaptcha.php file will not be uncertain at some point.

    Therefore, the combination would, if the function is guaranteed, actually the more attractive option.
    If it might be a problem, but I would make the change.
    I just wanted to ask if anyone would consider thinking of using Simple Captcha and ReCaptcha v3 together.

    Thread Starter DjPD

    (@djpd)

    Really?
    It would be best to realize it, if one simply creates a way to install a checkbox. ??
    Under forms. So you have already created and offered a new field “Agreement Checkbox”. ?? It would be great if there would be a “Gravatar Checkbox”. So that you could install it just as well. ?? And only those who want to use, then build it. And those who want to install it will certainly agree if it gets more in design.
    So, it does not have to be firmly anchored in the design. It would be enough to offer a field in the form. What would be great. ??
    Sorry that I wanted to motivate you again. But I still think great.
    Thank you for your quick response.
    Thanks. ??
    Dj

    Thread Starter DjPD

    (@djpd)

    I wanted to give feedback.
    The bug was fixed with the last update. ??
    Thank you.

    Thread Starter DjPD

    (@djpd)

    Unfortunately the site is not public yet. And the problem exists both with and without hmtl.
    And CSS changes I have only taken to test. But only temporary.

    I have inserted in the default form only a checkbox (Custom Field). But the lyrics are a bit longer and I do not know if it’s because of that. But you have to get a consent now.

    Hi,
    Maybe I have the same problem and therefore a little question.
    Google says I have 404 pages. I looked and saw that google only sees the /. Otherwise, the page would forward.
    Google-404: /category/my-article
    My URL Source: /category/my-article/
    Destination URL: /category/my-new-article

    How can I set redirection to redirect my-article and my-article/ to my-new-article?
    Is there a solution or do I have to make a redirect for my-article and an extra for my-article/? It’s all about the /.

    Do you have an idea?

    Thread Starter DjPD

    (@djpd)

    Oh yeah. Painfully complicated in any case. ??

    But you answer was very helpful. And I also believe that your plugin is in any case compliant. Because no data is collected from visitors. Therefore, safe.
    Many Thanks ??

    Thread Starter DjPD

    (@djpd)

    Many Thanks.
    I just tried [catlist starting_with = “a”], also different variants with name, etc.
    But nothing is displayed to me.

    I wanted to display an alphabetical list. Additional HTML code between the letters.

    <div class = "bigaplha"> A </ div>
    A Titel1
    A title2
    A Share3
    <p class = "up"> & lt; <a href="#uptostart"> up </a> & gt; </ p>
    <div class = "bigaplha"> B </ div>
    B-Titel1
    B-title2
    B-Share3

    But that is not possible with the normal shortcode, right?

    I’ve always thought that it would be best to select and display each article with a first letter. These are of course many requests, but I do not know how to do it better. Except maybe with its own function or something. Then I could first read out all the articles in the category and then simply spend and write something in between each letter jump.
    But I think I can not do that yet.

    Thread Starter DjPD

    (@djpd)

    Thank you for your help.
    The error message is no longer displayed. However, the site does not show me any results.
    I have a Parent Category and would like to have all the articles with the first letters A, B, C, etc. displayed. So I have a main category, which also includes subcategories. And I want all the articles (main and sub-categories) to be displayed. Subcategories should also be considered.
    Is that possible?
    I once tried [catlist name="Sub Category" orderby=title order=asc starting_with="a" post_type="post, recipe" numberposts=-1] , but to no avail.

    Is there a trick or do you have a tip, which I could try.
    I would like to display all articles in alphabetical order. But with the shortcode the page shows nothing to me. But I have articles with the initials “A”.

    Thread Starter DjPD

    (@djpd)

    OK. Thanks. ??
    I’ll contact you if I have further questions. Thank you.

    Thread Starter DjPD

    (@djpd)

    Sorry. I try again differently.
    I already read that your plugin already uses the Double-Opt-In method when subscribing to comments, right?
    Then that’s already done. I had read in your description nowhere that subscribing to comments, there is a double opt-in. that’s why I was unsure.
    On your homepage is however that there is a double opt-in.

    Meanwhile, I also read that you have a so-called hook installed. Would not it be much better if you include a checkbox (consent to data processing) directly, so that you do not actually need an additional plugin.

    Thread Starter DjPD

    (@djpd)

    Sorry for the late answer.
    No, he does not use your plugin. Your plugin only needs to be installed to use all features of the theme.
    I have seen that you can probably reconcile both. I think I can get it manually. ??

    Thread Starter DjPD

    (@djpd)

    Hi JP,

    vielen Dank für deine Antwort. Ich glaube, ich brauche Dir die Daten (erst einmal) nicht mehr zu geben.
    Ich war gerade nochmal auf meiner Seite und jetzt werden die Buttons richtig angezeigt. Vielleicht ein Chachingproblem? Ich werde aber nun hin und wieder mal gucken und wenn es nochmal Auftritt, mache ich ein Screenshot und melde mich nochmal.
    Danke aber schonmal für deine Mühen.

    Thread Starter DjPD

    (@djpd)

    Vielen Dank für die super Antwort.
    K?nnte man bzw. w?re es eigentlich sinnvoll, die Sekunden zu erh?hen?
    Ich mein, theoretisch würde so eine Abfrage auch alle halbe oder sogar jede Stunde reichen, oder?
    Ist nur mal so eine Frage. Wobei, wenn Sie schreiben, dass das nicht auff?llt, dann br?uchte man auch nichts ?ndern.

    Vielen Dank nochmal.

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 40 total)