Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 replies - 76 through 83 (of 83 total)
  • Forum: Plugins
    In reply to: [footnotes] [UPDATE 2.0.8]
    Plugin Contributor Jimmy Thai

    (@docteurfitness)

    Thank you for your message.

    I don’t think the < a > has a negative effect on SEO. But as it is not useful for me personally, I prefer to remove it ??

    Thanks anyway for your plugin. It’s really one of those I consider as indispensable) ??

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by Jimmy Thai.
    Forum: Plugins
    In reply to: [footnotes] [UPDATE 2.0.8]
    Plugin Contributor Jimmy Thai

    (@docteurfitness)

    Thanks a lot for the correction, it works perfectly with the reinsertion of style=”style.

    The speaker-mute class is useful for users of the speaker plugin which allows to read the text but not for others. No problem for me, I can integrate it manually in the code at each update.

    Concerning the click zones, it’s true that it’s less precise with my modifications. I was inspired by what Wikipedia does.
    A large click zone sometimes gives the impression that we don’t know which link we are on. With a little css, you can make an underline to emphasize the zone, but I don’t like the underline here.

    For the < a >, I removed it not for the color but because I’m superstitious about SEO, even if there is no href, I’m afraid it plays a negative role on the page. No proof to that, just a belief ^^.

    Question : does this play a role for the functioning of the plugin ?

    Because for double notes, a click on the second note has no effect.

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by Jimmy Thai.
    • This reply was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by Jimmy Thai.
    Plugin Contributor Jimmy Thai

    (@docteurfitness)

    @pewgeuges

    unfortunately, the new version does not work on my website.

    the footnotes n°1 is annotated “15” as on the video. https://streamable.com/pmsqz0

    The footnote block at the bottom is not visible.

    However, it works on the second post with 2.0.6 but not with developpment version (nothing works)

    Plugin Contributor Jimmy Thai

    (@docteurfitness)

    After installing the latest version in production, I don’t seem to have seen any change.
    Was it uploaded to WordPress?

    https://streamable.com/pmsqz0

    Plugin Contributor Jimmy Thai

    (@docteurfitness)

    Hello,

    thank you for everything

    I installed the production version and there seems to be a problem with the first article.

    For the other loaded articles, it works fine though.

    To illustrate this I made a video with before/after installation.

    https://streamable.com/y78xml

    Best regards

    Plugin Contributor Jimmy Thai

    (@docteurfitness)

    thank you for your message ??

    I must confess that I don’t use tooltips and that I didn’t check if it worked well with version 2.0.4.

    I think I prefer the new layout with prepended arrows ??

    Best regards,

    (sorry for my english)

    Plugin Contributor Jimmy Thai

    (@docteurfitness)

    Hello,

    thank you for your reply.

    I find the half-height setting good but it is personal.
    For the speed, I also think it’s good like that ??

    I’m glad you like this improvement, it’s really a big improvement compared to other footnotes plugins ??

    Plugin Contributor Jimmy Thai

    (@docteurfitness)

    Hello,

    Thank you for replying to my request.

    To make the plugin compatible with the auto load post function, I had added code in these 5 files :

    /wp-content/plugins/footnotes/class/task.php

    the 4 files in /wp-content/plugins/footnotes/templates/public

    You can see modif by comparaison here : https://gofile.io/d/xymFGB

Viewing 8 replies - 76 through 83 (of 83 total)