eddr

Thanks, updated – still happens.

Can you reproduce?
needs define(‘WP_DEBUG’, true); in wp-config.php

thanks, but as I wrote, a copy of the site with only Yoast activated resulted in the same issue

Same here. It should be fixed

PHP 7.0.X, WP 4.8

Same here.

Guys, you need to fix it

People, seems like only specific “browser cache” options result in this error. Change some of the options

Same here

OK, thanks. Is there any limitations for using SMTP instead of the API?

Same here. Any solution??

Great!

How can one say thanks for such an excellent and useful plugin?

hence “inline & defer” ??

EDIT: Oh, I understand now, you should inline the css you want to be above the fold. Would be nice to paste a link to the CSS file as another option to inlining it

Thanks. So, with this option, there will be several CSS files? one of them will be in the head to load quicker?
I didn’t understand it from the description of this option

also, how does AO knows which are the important files? according to the header/footer parameter in the WP enqueue function?

Thanks

Thanks for the reply

1. that’s (currently) not supported

Would be nice!

2. W3TC is great, but what do you mean with “it’s less hard on combining”?

The words I chose aren’t that informative indeed. What I meant is that it doesn’t combine it all together. Sometimes it will create several combined CSS files
I don’t say it is easy or trivial, but it is very useful

Also, would be nice to have an option to reorder the files and inline stuff. Would be nice and useful

3. depends, sometimes it’s better to have 1 big one (even when in parallel you still have the connection setup for each file separately), sometimes not (no connection setup cost in HTTP/2, but compression is more efficient on larger files). as with all web performance optimization measures one should test to confirm which approach is best fit for a specific context.

Also, sometimes only small portion of the CSS is needed to start rendering. Currently, with one big file, the browser would wait for the big file. True, in smaller files it’s not as bad

4. People will be glad to pay, you should know. Also donate

Hi

Testing it with ok sized site. Some points, maybe I’m missing something:

1. Would be nice to have minify only for CSS/JS. Meaning, not combined
2. It seems that Autoptimize is not as good as W3TC in minifying and combining the CSS and JS. On the same site, and others I’ve tried, W3TC doesn’t have dependency problems, maybe it’s because it’s less hard on combining.
3. Also, another thing with Combining – I’m not sure that having a single big CSS file is better than having 3-4 smaller files, because they can be downloaded in parallel, at least in the CDN case

maybe in one of the power-ups, later eddr. the “critical css”-one
will indeed allow one to specify above-the-fold-CSS based on custom post type, on page template and on conditional tags, so the same principle could be applied to a power-up to create specific JS- or CSS-exclusions.

Such exclusions could be great

but please do test 2.1.0, I’ve haven’t gotten enough feedback yet to release soon ??

I will!

Hi

Any plans for defining which file to include where (page-template/post-type, etc.)? maybe in the products and services?

Thanks

No one?