FECKcorp

^ Hah! If it is, do you want his number? ??

Very nice and professional design. I’d rate an 8.4 out of 10.

It’s rather boring? In all honestly, I would have (and did) navigate away from it within 5 seconds of landing on the page. Please add some color, images, and love! ??

Change the theme to a far more professional theme, remove the YouTube videos and replace them with originally generated content written by yourself (sans the typos that are in your current posts), and keep your content organized and searchable. Best of luck.

Interesting idea. You’ll need mass appeal and recognition for it to ground itself on the Internet, but I’m standing in your support. Best of luck!

It isn’t that slow.

timsainb, I can surely state that the design located at the ‘watercolor’ subdomain is one of the most beautiful and Utopian themes that I have come across in my day. Excellent job.

Far too many sub-sections with what comes across as hundreds of news items, as well as scattered images. It’s extremely overwhelming. Good basis of design, however.

A few things:

1) Your header logo and search form (the entire header really) has been chopped off by the top of the browser bar and is partially invisible in Safari. That is an error in your CSS coding and cross-browser compatibility.

2) The tagging plugin, while functional for some, truly makes the homepage appear a bit unorganized. Since this is a car blog, why not replace that with an image slideshow that links to specific posts, or something of the sort?

You seem to have forgotten the link! ??

Quite a nice design; one the best designs that I’ve come across so far on here. You have a few validation errors, but that’s a minor detail (unless validation was one of your major prerogatives, of course).

I would agree with Grounded Group regarding the blandness of the design. Spruce it up with a little color? Then it’ll look awesome!

Better graphics will make the website appear 10x better and bring out the excellent design that you have going.

Not much deviation from the template’s original format? But nice nonetheless.

Simple, nice.

A tad confusing.