frizzel
Forum Replies Created
-
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Fast Velocity Minify] Minify HTML errorIt’s on a local install at the moment.
However, I noticed a difference between the 2 methods.
When your plug-in does the minifying there’s a line (without any tags): ob_start_detected
That comes from All-In-One SEO Pack:if ( $this->ob_start_detected ) { echo 'ob_start_detected '; }
When I just make that echo line empty, there are no errors in the minifying.
I’m now only puzzled why your plug-in triggers this, and the other doesn’t.@philip Ah yes, I see what you mean by the plugin targeting wp_content which indeed wouldn’t work with Elementor. I understand what you are doing in supplied code. However, the section blocks I wanted to not load have varying content. So, I decided to save them as Elementor templates and then conditionally call them in the post type template used.
Thank you for your help and suggestions.
??? The shortcode tags I mentioned ARE designed to not just ‘hide’ but instead ‘not load’ content in between. What you are saying is that Elementor does not support this (at least the [/close] tag). That’s a big difference, and to be honest quite an unsatisfactory answer.
But, as a suggestion: why not have the Elementor option of hiding a section make it ‘do not load this section’ instead of ‘display:none’? I mean, if you want to hide it, you obviously don’t want to load it.
- This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by frizzel.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Ocean Extra] Conflict with MapplicThat should indeed fix this.
Thank you.Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Ocean Extra] Conflict with MapplicI perfectly understand chocolat.js is not included in the theme anymore. That’s not the point. It goes wrong with the deregister scripts.
If in the file includes/panel/scripts.php I comment
wp_deregister_script( 'magnific-popup' );
Mapplic scripts load, but with wrong css.
If I also comment
wp_deregister_style( 'magnific-popup' );
everything is fine.Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Ocean Extra] Conflict with MapplicI was about to post about your suggestion as I saw it in the theme’s log.
Yes, I’ve done that already.
It does not resolve the issue.
Can you please now look into that file I mentioned every time and resolve the issue there?
Thank you.Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Ocean Extra] Conflict with MapplicI already tried that, but made no difference.
However, I had an outdated version of OceanWP theme. Updated that to latest version (1.4.6). Also, again updated Ocean Extra to latest version (1.3.7).
Same result: scripts and styles of Mapplic would not load, whether Lightbox JS enabled or disabled.Only when I replaced the latest version with the 1.3.4 version of the file includes/panel/scripts.php Mapplic scripts and styles would load. So it’s clearly in there with the call to the new script.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Ocean Extra] Conflict with MapplicAlthough I have disabled the Lightbox script, it seems the conflict is indeed caused by the change from chocolat.js.
I have tested 1.3.5, but with the includes/panel/scripts.php from 1.3.4 and then Mapplic scripts do load.
By the way, shouldn’t that change in the lightbox script be in the changelog?
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Ocean Extra] Conflict with MapplicYes, I have disabled the Lightbox script.
By the way, it’s not as I assumed from 1.3.6 that causes the problem, but from version 1.3.5
Wow, very quick reply, thank you.
OK, I’ll wait and see what you come up with in a next release.
In the meantime, just to let you know, I thoroughly enjoy working with your plug-in (and I think you deserve more downloads).
Plus, your add-ons (especially the front end editing) are very nice, too.
Not sure, but I was not thinking of an extended discussion (because that’s in the ‘Messages’ already). More like: now the reported bug or task is in a field “Description” which I suppose is fine. But then be able to reply in a separate text box which would have a description like “Reply” or “Solution” or “Fixed” (maybe even a choice? but that’s probably going a bit too far).
Forum: Reviews
In reply to: [WooCommerce] 166 fixes since v3.0 … and countingI perfectly understand software is not bug free, thank you very much.
But this is about the AMOUNT of fixes since launch of v3.0.
And that is far above what I consider ‘normal’. Which tells me – and I repeat – you have NOT thoroughly tested before public release.
If you don’t agree with that, you are either in denial or just arrogant.Hi @woodyhayday,
Thanks for the quick replies. Really appreciate that.
What I’ll do is remove WordFence and try to install your plug-in again, probably tomorrow (it’s quite late here now).
Regarding 2. (de-activation): No, the plug-in was in the list, however, clicking on “de-activate” just did nothing.
But, as said, will try to install again and post the results here.
Hi @woodyhayday,
Thanks for your reply. To answer your questions:
1. PHP 7.0
2. No, just a normal website.
3. Yes, WordFence (and maybe I should remove that and replace with Sucuri, as some other hosting provider has advised me).
4. SiteGround
5. Uhm, not yet, maybe later.Thanks.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [AcuGIS Leaflet Maps] Google Roadmap?Finally figured it out: ‘layers=m’. Would be nice to have that clearly in the documentation, though. (Or have I just missed that somewhere?)