Forum Replies Created

Viewing 12 replies - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Hi,

    If you are using WordPress, Gutenberg?has now been updated so if yu add a new social block for Twitter you can choose between the new and old icon (but it won’t update automatically, you have to change your icon to the new one manually) so that is now all good.

    However, the Hueman theme social selector (in the screenshot above) still doesn’t have the new icon, only the two old ones (normal and square, but both birds)!

    Hi,

    Thanks for getting back to me. I had assumed the icon would just update automatically, but now I see that I have to add it again I can do so and it works fine in some places.

    I think the additional confusion is some themes (Hueman in my case) also have settings for social icons, and they don’t appear to have updated yet.

    I have just upgraded to WP 6.4.1 but I still have the old Twitter icon. Is there something else I need to do?

    I second that! It’s about time it was updated, but I fear the author has given up supporting this so it will never happen!

    Thread Starter heman321

    (@heman321)

    I am afraid this is one of our development sites, so it isn’t available outside of our office. I am a software dev. though, so I hope I can be helpful in diagnosing the issue for you.

    This is a Windows server, so the caching is just Disk\Disk Advanced.

    I assume the PHP that minifies the JS is failing, so when the browser tries to fetch it, the HTTP 500 is because the PHP is failing.

    If I try and enable the minify debug option I get “It appears Minify?URL?rewriting is not working. Please verify that the server configuration allows .htaccess” but as I am running on Windows there is no .htaccess file (or at least, not one that does anything) and it has not created and IIS rewrite rules in the web.config.

    Could we just log $this->a somewhere and see what it is working on?

    Thread Starter heman321

    (@heman321)

    Hello, any news on this? Have you been able to reproduce the issue?

    Thread Starter heman321

    (@heman321)

    OK, so I had a test site that was running CF7 5.3 and that worked. I noticed that if I ran IE11 it used the AJAX method but if I put it in to IE10 emulation mode it then fell back to postback, which also worked.
    I then upgraded the site to CF7 5.4.2 and I noticed that not only did it then not work for IE10 (emulation) or IE11, but both were now using the postback method.
    I also tried as you suggested and disabled all other plugins and switched to the 2021 theme.
    Have you tested this with IE11 and reCAPTCHA yourself and seen it working?

    Thread Starter heman321

    (@heman321)

    It’s quite a basic site, so just:

    All-in-One WP Migration Version 7.37 by ServMask
    All-in-One WP Migration File Extension Version 1.7 by ServMask, Inc
    Contact Form 7 Version 5.4.2 by Takayuki Miyoshi
    Flamingo Version 2.2.2 by Takayuki Miyoshi
    WPFront Scroll Top Version 2.0.2 by Syam Mohan
    Yoast SEO Version 15.9 by Team Yoast

    And we are using YOOtheme Version 2.3.19.

    Thread Starter heman321

    (@heman321)

    I don’t think it is spam, at a guess, I think the reCAPTCHA is failing and it is defaulting to spam, rather than it actually being detected as spam.

    I do know that if I open IE and Edge on the same PC (so same IP address) and submit exactly the same details, the Edge one (with Ajax submission) will work and the IE (with postback submission) will fail. So I don’t think it is spam; it is the postback method failing for some reason.

    I just checked the spam folder and the reason given in Flamingo is “Spam log: reCAPTCHA response token is empty.”

    Thread Starter heman321

    (@heman321)

    The contact form at the bottom of this page is an example: https://www.ecapex.co.uk

    I changed the “Submission was referred to as spam” message to say there was a “problem” not “error” so you can see that it is that reason that is triggering.

    P.S. I have another site running V5.3.2 still and can confirm it works OK on that site.

    Thread Starter heman321

    (@heman321)

    No, because my understanding is that this simply modifies the wp-config for you and as I have access to the server it’s no hassle to do it manually. I am always a bit cautious about installing anything unless it is absolutely necessary on any of our sites…

    But are you saying this is doing something else behind the scenes and we should be using this instead of hacking the wp-config file ourselves?

    Thread Starter heman321

    (@heman321)

    Thanks for replying.

    I host this on my own Windows Server, so there is no hosting control panel, just a pretty clean install of WP.

Viewing 12 replies - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)