landed

Thank you this secret screen needs a button in the dashboard! It was the solution.

Indeed lets see if we can sort this out.
https://imgur.com/a/WFwoGPh

It’s not a cache issue.

Felt this same pain last time, back here again! Thanks will try this one out.

For the Plugin it simply says PayPal Standard and there is no plugin installed for it. It must come pre packaged in Woo. Sadly nothing inside the logs. I guess there isn’t enough to go on here to debug further. Yes whole site up to date.
Would be handy to know if people are getting the cancelled order emails ok.

You’re better than that George?

“There’s nothing to address here.” Maybe there is.

I didn’t post with the intention to get into a semantic battle or Plato. I just posted to get some possible security support. But all the same I appreciate you took some time to educate me, which is what I came for.

WordPress could do more to block these password resets programmatically. I am not requesting wordpress to spam the world to stop poor human beings from doing their thing. Platforms shouldn’t need plugins for basic security related issues IMO.

The username being exposed to request the password reset is one end point that could be addressed. I see no settings to block this. It just feels too easy an exploit IMO.

Thank you everyone. Coincidentally with the last post I was going over theme related settings again as I now found a basic blog post image was getting an incorrect src set. This clue helped massively and the others posting replies here. So thank you. It seems this is a THEMIFY issue in a setting ‘feature from hell’ they call https://themify.me/docs/image-script

So I think this can be closed now. Phew. Again thanks all for the support.

That is likely not going to have the issue and only tell me like a fitness tracker that which I already know!

I need some insight into the development of the main product image from woo team. That’s not likely to happen I get that. But there may have been others reporting the same so I do feel my post is of value.

Thank you for your contribution.

Thank you for coming back.

You said “Not only that, but it also appears that the?f02846ee759da375bf7e2a?part is enabled by functionality outside WooCommerce core.”

No this is just part of the image filename that was originally imported. It is quite random I admit (and a red herring).

https://shopstylereview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Magnetic-Love-Heart-Bracelet-Set-Jewellery-Womenswear-f02846ee759da375bf7e2a-1black-and-blackblack-and-blueblack-and-pin-5.jpg

That one loads- it is the original image. If the source code tried to render this image then there is no broken image.

Whatever is causing this -1024×1024-600×600 to be added, renaming at later time is what causes the issue. The original image is there. I just can’t find what is breaking the filename. It is probably my Themify theme but they seem to not understand either.

I have seen some post somewhere that woo has an offline feature for optimising product images and I wonder if that mechanism is it. I can no longer find anything online again about this ‘feature’ from hell.

• This reply was modified 9 months, 1 week ago by landed.

I found where the 600 is specified and it shows that woocommerce is doing this image optimisation as part of some offline script. So it looks like the core is the issue. For some reason on mine the urls don’t get properly checked and so this happens:

What the above image shows is that the https://shopstylereview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Magnetic-Love-Heart-Bracelet-Set-Jewellery-Womenswear-f02846ee759da375bf7e2a-1black-and-blackblack-and-blueblack-and-pin-5-1024×1024-600×600.jpg doesn’t load.

The reason is it’s not the original image and this image doesn’t exist.

So the woocommerce logic creating this zoom box main product image is somehow wrong. At least on my site.

You can see in this URL – https://shopstylereview.com/product/magnetic-love-heart-bracelet-set/

The issue is from whatever script is appending the 600×600 to the url, hence it breaks. As image600×600600×600600×600600×600.jpg doesn’t exist. I exaggerated to show the issue.

I have read about some kind of script which runs in the background on product images to make sure they are uniform in size. I believe whatever this is is partly to blame. But now I cannot find this online. Am I going mad was it a dream.

Tried storefront and different images. I have given up for the moment. But appreciate that you all had ideas. For that thank you.

• This reply was modified 9 months, 2 weeks ago by landed.

Thanks for coming in, I need more heads on this one.
I tried flushing the permalinks and it made no difference.
Yes of course if I rename the image to match the url request it will be found- but why should I need to do this for each odd product?

The source is the issue not the images. I don’t have a status menu item and looked for it- sorry.

Thanks for reaching out. I have here a standard set of uploaded images and as you can see they upload with the correct postfixes.

So something sometimes causes the postfix to apply to the postfix and you get the duplication image url e.g.
600×600 applied twice as above causing the 404. These appear in a src set in the code and cause an issue. I don’t see the issue so badly in mobile. Another confusing trait making debug harder.

The images are there so no issues with the generation side. So what is causing these postfixes to get applied twice.

In pseudo code I would do the following:

var prefixs = [xxx,’600×600,’yyy]
var orignal path = original image path
create source set with full prefixes, make sure to apply the prefixes only to original path.

So either the original path is mistaken or we are not doing enough checks when creating the thumbnail paths.

• This reply was modified 1 year ago by landed.

It was probably a joomla site, or less likely wordpress. I can’t remember now 8 weeks later. I uninstalled the plugin as it was fatal and prevented the site from working. I would be glad to know that you have updated and tested both platforms. It looked like you had left the building. I can’t be more specific now.

We are not new since it’s integrated with the old system. I will check that out in more detail though thank you. One would hope that there is a way to easily swap but I am guessing not.