RL

But it still says 84% Physical memory usage. So perhaps its still processing.

So I did both remove original backup and remove optimized.

When I look in file manager now, there is over 250 (jpg.webp).

So I dont think it deleted them. Which is where I make the assumption that the files in file manager are not in “sync” with the media manager, or litespeed

So Im not sure if there is another step I can take now.

Ok. So Yes. Ive hit that button many times and tried to to remove these.

However, I did it again now and the server is showing 100% I/O Usage and RAM is at 60%.

And the browser window is showing activity and a blank screen still, after 300 seconds. So Im not sure if it is locked up, or if its still processing.

So suppose Ill leave it alone until the CPU usage shows a drop?

this was months ago. I was trying to speed up my admin

I dont know where the option is for “remove origin backup.” And I cannot find it in LSCWP. So I dont think I utilized this when I would have uninstalled prior.

I run perfmatters and WP db cleaner.

I cleared tables with wp db cleaner, and that where I maybe was going fast and loose. I think Ive reinstalled litespeed since that however.

no. I am using a plugin that physically creates folders, so I dont have just a standard uploads folder. And this has not been an SEO benefit that I hoped, however it doesnt seem to have been a problem.

This issue started after I was deleting images, or the database cleaning plugin. The webp optimization stats in media interface disappeared. So, I suspect Its possible I accidentally deleted some organizing file withinin LSCWP as I did go through and clean up a bunch of files.

yes.
xxx.png.webp,
xxx.jpg.webp

Im not extremely familiar with the database. I thought the database is a reflection of the files that are in file manager.

And in File manager, there are a many xxx.webp files that were created by litespeed, yet they are not showing in my media library.

So what Im trying to do is get the webp files to be reflected in litespeed so I can delete them. And then clean up the other files which Im not using.

Ok.

Rankmath support has been willing to try to resolve it. Should I go in that direction? Or do you anticipate this being resolved in the next update?

Thank you for any specific input

Ok. Is this a problem on your end? And are you going to resolve it?

Im not an expert on code. However the experts who have addresses it suggest this is a problem in Publish Press code. Which is best for all your users if you address it by altering your code.

It seems that you position your product as being compatible with Rankmath. If that is not the case, please advise and Ill move on to another solution

Hi Steve

This is the 2nd time you have suggested that I can pay to get an answer. The first being on May 27. And Im happy to pay for plugins when It makes sense for me.

It looks as if there is a code error and Im trying to identify if that is the case and if you are going to resolve it.

bump

You can see the errors through the validator??

And It seems to be showing up “unparseable structured data” in Google search console with about 15 pages having been added recently.

A second and 3rd Ranktmath rep has chimed in and they all suggest this is a PublishPress error. Which is best if publish press can fix it instead of Rankmath patching it.
Below is the most recent message from rankmath

And I can 100% confirm this error starts and stop when I activate publish press.
——

This is validated in the Rich Result Test.

However, if you test it on schema.org, it seems it is incorrectly been added under the Organization property causing an invalid structure.

Since you didn’t add any custom schemas, please check this one with PublishPress first if they have a solution for this since they are the ones adding the Person schema.

If they can confirm this isn’t from them, let me know here and we will investigate this further.

Looking forward to helping you.

• This reply was modified 1 year, 9 months ago by RL.

https://validator.schema.org/ is the tool I use because I thought this was the more comprehensive.

When I check That on pages like this I get 6 errors. But in the rich snippets tools it is no errors.

Either way, it seems like a small bit of code is being duplicated.

https://xzib.com/e/gallery-weekend-berlin

specifically a double bracket in the code was referenced