Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)
  • Thread Starter mailchef

    (@mailchef)

    Danke. Debug und Log gecheckt. Germanized findet offenbar keinerlei Bestellungen. Dennoch habe ich eine Liste von etlichen Bestellungen in dem Zeitraum. 9 “completed” und 14 “cancelled” oder “pending payment”. Für frühere Quartale hatten die Reports funtkioniert.

    [start] => 2024-07-01
    [end] => 2024-09-30

    2024-10-12T16:47:10+00:00 Info 0 applicable orders found 2024-10-12T16:47:10+00:00 Info Completed called 2024-10-12T16:47:10+00:00 Info Completed net total: 0 2024-10-12T16:47:10+00:00 Info Completed tax total: 0 2024-10-12T16:47:10+00:00 Info Completed Q3/2024 @ 2024-10-12. Status: completed

    Thread Starter mailchef

    (@mailchef)

    Die exportierten Dateien haben wenig Inhalt:
    v1.1

    und BOP (was heisst das eigentlich?):
    Country code,”Tax rate”,”Taxable base”,Amount

    Thread Starter mailchef

    (@mailchef)

    I must correct myself. The links are still not working. it seemed like it. so it is not caused by your plugin. Still investigating and trying to disable plugins which are somewhat related to emails or accounts.

    When using the link the login/registration page shows without any message and user was not activated. no error either.

    Links is like this: https://www.mydomain.com/sfo/my-account/?activate=2342346%3A%24P%25Hklhf987Hkfhis&suffix=yes

    domain/code obfuscated

    Thread Starter mailchef

    (@mailchef)

    If you don’t read replies It doesn’t help repeating questions.

    Thread Starter mailchef

    (@mailchef)

    Do you have problems accessing/reading/comprehending posts in this discussion?

    Thread Starter mailchef

    (@mailchef)

    you are asking the same question again which I had already answered.

    Thread Starter mailchef

    (@mailchef)

    1. This takes ages with 267000 folders in there.
    2. wrong. I have done NOTHING to my shop for a month and exactly that is why it has accumulated. I then tried to clear the cache and it was moved to the tmpwpfc folder. I assume WP FP has no limits and was creating more and more product tag page combination of my 226 Tags which amounts to an enourmous size of possible subpages.
    Thread Starter mailchef

    (@mailchef)

    the latter tmpWpfc. But as I understand it is a temporary folder to where cache files are moved first when clearing the cache which I had attempted. Plugin crashed then and I was left with that folder.

    I had to ask my provider to remove it as it was too large for any file manager or ftp program.

    Thread Starter mailchef

    (@mailchef)

    Not resolved. that’s why I said “If it worked for me :-(“

    Thread Starter mailchef

    (@mailchef)

    Wow. Awesome. If it worked for me. ??

    Neither it displays widget names nor hides the widget.

    Found this snipped to hide widgets for user roles:

    /**
    * Hide_widgets_role_based
    * @author Ohad Raz <[email protected]>
    */
    class Hide_widgets_role_based{
        $has_selector = false;
        $js_selector = '';
        $roles_hide =array();
        /**
         * class constructor
         * @author Ohad Raz <[email protected]>
         * @param array $args [description]
         */
        function __construct($args = array()){
            if (is_admin())
                add_action('widgets_init', array($this,'hide', 999));
        }
    
        /**
         * the money function that hides the widgets on the admin side when the user has a specific role
         * @return void
         */
        public function hide(){
            global $pagenow;
            if ($pagenow == 'widgets.php'){
                global $current_user;
                get_currentuserinfo();
                $sperator = "";
                foreach ($this->roles_hide as $role => $widgets) {
                    if ($this->has_role($role)){
                        foreach ((array)$widgets as $w_id) {
                            unregister_widget( $w_id );
                        }
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    
    
        /**
         * add a widget to hide per role
         * @param string $role   role name
         * @param string $widget widget id
         */
        public function addHide($role,$widget){
            if (is_array($widget)){
                $tmp = isset($roles_hide[$role])? $roles_hide[$role]: array();
                $roles_hide[$role] = array_merge($tmp, (array)$widget);
            }else{
                $roles_hide[$role][] = $widget;
            }
        }
    
        /**
         * has_role check if a user has a role
         * @param  int  $user_id user id
         * @return boolean          
         */
        public function has_role($user_id = null){
            if ( is_numeric( $user_id ) )
                $user = get_userdata( $user_id );
            else
                $user = wp_get_current_user();
    
            if ( empty( $user ) )
            return false;
    
            return in_array( $role, (array) $user->roles );
        }
    }
    
    $widgets_hide = new Hide_widgets_role_based();
    $widgets_hide->addHide('guest','wpc_filters_widget');
    Thread Starter mailchef

    (@mailchef)

    Yah, anything can be done with custom coding but you are a programmer. I can just do copy and paste programming ??

    It was a suggestion for a useful function/improvement.

    I think it makes more sense to present customers with the most sought after options and not just the most keywords which are assigned the most by the shop.

    Same as google shows the most popular results not just the websites which use the keyword most often.

    Thread Starter mailchef

    (@mailchef)

    annoying to signup for every plugin’s own forum….

    and posting gives me an error:

    ReferenceError: /app/views/components/idea-cards/publicIdeaCardDetailed.ejs:216 214|

    Thread Starter mailchef

    (@mailchef)

    It sounds like a manual effort to give each entry a priority. Furthermore tags wouldn’t be compatible with anything else anymore if they are entered as customer fields if I see it correctly.

    And I don’t think a custom key would enable FE to record which one has been used how often.

    I try to explain again:
    I am thinking of a tag cloud. sorting options normally are either by name or usage amount (how many products were tagged).
    But I think sorting by popularity (how often has a customer selected the tag for a search) would make more sense.
    just because products often have a specific tag doesn’t mean that tag is more relevant/popular for customers.

    Thread Starter mailchef

    (@mailchef)

    yes, necessary for some other definitions but with the :root thing it doesn’t work.

    Thread Starter mailchef

    (@mailchef)

    The definition I could find which controls the colour is:

    #root {
    –fs-color-secondary: #FF9900;
    }

    All my attempts to make a Darklup custom CSS to redefine didn’t work.

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)