masvil

Crystal clear, thank you!

Hi @aahulsebos,

Makes sense, thanks for the explanation. So I will do the same with Koko and Statify for a while.

Happy you’re developing with performance in mind.

Regards, masvil

first of all when using a eCommerce site it is highly recommended to use the worker mode present inside the plugin rather than the default page rule based mode.

@isaumya I think this should be included in the FAQ section. I’ve seen you telling the same dozens of times ??

@davidanderson your lead JS developer can be the best in class in their own field, but that missing label is a matter of UX, not JS.

We have option A and option B, mutually exclusive.

You can’t simply assume the user reads that label on option A, then switches to option B, then remembers the label even if not visible anymore, then “understand” the disappeared label on option A applies to option B too.

Just ask a UX specialist if a decent level of accuracy and consistency is there.

• This reply was modified 2 years, 3 months ago by masvil.

@davidanderson the weak point is in the video linked by @thekendog

The interaction with page-speed tools ONLY appears in “Defer selected Javascript files” feature’s description. You should ALSO add it to “Defer all the Javascript files”, which also interact with page-speed tools.

The job can be done with a slight change to the UI. There at least are 2 ways:

1. Don’t make that description disappearing when switching between option;

2. Include the interaction with page-speed tools to both feature’s description.

Good to know, thanks ??

Problem already occurred with 3.2.4 on one of my sites. Backend was not accessible as well, so I had to rename /wp-content/plugins/wp-optimize/ to disable the plugin. I Rolled back to 3.2.3, disabled automatic update and activated notification on this topic so to know when the update will be out.

Out on next update?

I agree 100%, and also asked to allow donations. Dev answered here: https://www.ads-software.com/support/topic/hidden-gem-17/#post-14788549

… but so far no way to donate ??

While quick indexing doesn’t help with ranking, I’m dealing with an edge case. I’m working to a new website for a client in a very, very small niche with small competition. They think the indexing itself will give them some visibility.

1. Good to know it can be done. I hope in the future you will add this feature to the GUI. I understand you’re confident on the uselessness of the “expanded” sitemap, and I guess you debated on this topic countless times.

2. It’s surprising to realize that SEO plugins claiming to “support” TranslatePress actually are just supported by it. Thanks for sharing!

3. That’s great, I will take this opportunity. Just first I would like to know if it is possible to restrict the access to certain categories of users on backend. Asking in advance so I get ready.

I appreciate your detailed response. You make very clear most sites don’t really need a sitemap. Anyway I’m working on a new one, and I need it to be indexed quickly.

1. Is there a way to add URLs to the TSF’s standard sitemap?

2. Don’t hate me for this: why other SEO plugins support TranslatePress or the other way around?

3. Unrelated: is there a Focus extension demo I can try? I can’t even find a video on YT.

Related feature request: please make classes accessible as text (copyable).

Yes, I’m talking about that form you mentioned. TranslatePress is installed on a staging clone. Can I privately send you an admin access and more info about the issue? If so, how?

I know this is a free support, so feel free to say no.

Thanks for your support and please accept my apologize for asking something easy to find by myself.

• This reply was modified 2 years, 7 months ago by masvil.

@unicorn03 you might want to change plugin description here as well, still mentioning “it allows you to securely and quickly customize your login page URL”.