Forum Replies Created

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Thread Starter monkeysrcool

    (@monkeysrcool)

    Thanks. I don’t know to what extent this is a genuine accessibility issue. I gave it one star because as it is currently, I cannot use the plugin. Presumably any company trying to be WCAG compliant will also be unable to use the plugin and could also waste their time using it. I will happily give a good rating if it is fixed, or if it turns out that I am incorrect and it is actually WCAG compliant already.
    Thanks.

    Thread Starter monkeysrcool

    (@monkeysrcool)

    Thanks for the reply.
    If that is the case, then why are the photos set to be background CSS images in the first place? They are not purely decorative and should have alt attributes according to WCAG, as far as I can tell. My company won’t allow me to use the plugin as it is currently, due to WCAG noncompliance. Therefore I have to say that it is a major shortcoming.
    Thanks again.

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)