pixxel

THe remaining prevailing opinion is to use code that is instead invisible to internet explorer:

thus:

#footer {
padding: 0 0 0 1px;
margin: 0 auto;
width: 760px;
clear: both;
}
body > #footer {
padding: 0;
}

as indicated. here: here

I do believe this may be the futureproof.. in the event that expressions will be incorporated into css sometime in the future. but the pendulum could swing both ways I feel at times.. if ie adopts firefox’ features or firefox ie’s. or maybe not. who really remembers any more. so which is better.. is this problem reducible to css expressions yay or nay?

What is the consensus here? But then again we may argue for javascript to lay browser-specific css or no?

If I liken microsoft to the choam commpany it is only as a pleasantly romantic notion.

It’s squarely an IE problem. I think Microsoft will be a thousand-year appendix to the history of computing, but it’s like the choam corporation or something. I think the real future is opensourced, and DVORAK keyboarded. That aside.. while we’re talking hacks, here’s a doozie (that I’m actually using!)

#footer {
position: expression(“relative”);
left:expression(“1px”);
}

this way IE evaluates these expressions.. but the rest of the browsers (and someone please correct me!) just ignore it.