RA_NPL

Hi, thanks for your quick. Okay, got it.

Awesome, thanks a lot for your quick support.

Hi,

not entirely sure but I think your reply is not related to this post.

Best, Nick

Hi,

many thanks for your reply. The GravityForms support mentioned GravityFlow as well. Unfortunately GravityFlow does not provide pre-order support.

I have also created a support request at https://www.approveme.com/, which looked promising, however I got no reply from them yet.

To me it is surprising, that there appears to be no existing (known) solution for custom offers and online purchase/checkout within the WordPress ecosystem. It seems like such a mass-relevant functionality. But anyway, let’s see if the mentioned providers are able to help. Otherwise, I would look for an alternative non-wordpress solution.

Best, Nick

Hi Mikko, brilliant. Works like a charm again. Thanks a lot for your quick support.

Same issue here.

Great stuff, thanks for your help. Works like a charm!

Thanks and awesome, I think I get what you are saying. To double-check: In the second row, you wrote

'#(\d{1,3}\-)?(\d{1,3})\s(\w)\s(\d{1,5})/(\d\d)#',

Do I not need to de-escape the \-? If so, would this be the final code?

// Custom Fix for Relevanssi plugin to detect court rulings in searches
add_filter( 'relevanssi_remove_punctuation', 'rlv_convert_filenumbers', 9 );
add_filter( 'relevanssi_post_content', 'rlv_convert_filenumbers' );
function rlv_convert_filenumbers( $a ) {
	$patterns = array(
  	'#(\d{1,3}-)?(\d{1,3})\s(\w)\s(\d{1,5})/(\d\d)#',
  	'#(\w)-(\d{1,4})/(\d\d)#',
  	'#(\w{1,2})\s(\w{2,3})\s(\d{1,4})/(\d\d)#',
  	'#(\w\w\w)\s(\d+)/(\d+)#',
	);
	$replacements = array(
  	'\1\2\3\4\5',
  	'\1\2\3',
  	'\1\2\3\4',
  	'\1\2\3',
	);
$a = preg_replace( $patterns, $replacements, $a );
  return $a;
}

Hi Mikko, sure I don’t want to bother you. You have been great help. Just if you find time: I created the following regex, which matched all reference numbers in my examples (see https://regex101.com/r/TIcybY/1):

((\d{1,3}\-)?(\d{1,3})\s(\w)\s(\d{1,5})\/(\d\d))|(\w\-\d{1,4}\/\d\d)|(\w{1,2}\s\w{2,3}\s\d{1,4}\/\d\d)|(\w\w\w\s\d{1,3}\/\d\d)

To avoid mistakes, would changing your snippet

$a = preg_replace( '#(\d+)\s(\w)\s(\d+)/(\d\d)#', '\1\2\3\4', $a );

to

$a = preg_replace( '#((\d{1,3}\-)?(\d{1,3})\s(\w)\s(\d{1,5})\/(\d\d))|(\w\-\d{1,4}\/\d\d)|(\w{1,2}\s\w{2,3}\s\d{1,4}\/\d\d)|(\w\w\w\s\d{1,3}\/\d\d)#', '\1\2\3\4', $a );

be correct? I am asking because of the opening and closing # which was not necessary in my regex tests to match the criteria and the ‘\1\2\3\4’ behind (I assume both don’t need change). Also, I had to escape the lone / in my tests to get matches.

Again many thanks for your great support. If this is too much efford for my specific case, I would understand.

Best, Nick

• This reply was modified 3 years, 2 months ago by RA_NPL.

Hi Mikko,

you are right. I was not aware that the court reference number pattern is more complex than initially expected – actually it is wildly more complex: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aktenzeichen_(Deutschland).

However regarding my specific field (civil law), it should be sufficient to include the following formats:

1. variant

– 1, 2 or 3 digits
– space
– single letter
– space
– 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 digits
– slash
– 2 digits

Examples: 5 C 84/21, 15 W 84/21, 5 O 184/20, 5 K 1996/19, 15 S 11384/18

2. variant

– 1, 2 or 3 digits
– minus or slash
– 1, 2 or 3 digits
– space
– single letter
– space
– 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 digits
– slash
– 2 digits

Examples: 3-06 O 24/21

3. variant

– 1 letter
– minus
– 1, 2, 3 or 4 digits
– slash
– 2 digits

Example: C-236/08

4. variant

– 1 or 2 letters
– space
– 2 or 3 letters
– space
– 1, 2, 3 or 4 digits
– slash
– 2 digits

Examples: I ZR 20/21, XI ZR 26/15, VI ZR 488/19

5. variant

– 3 letters
– space
– 1, 2 or 3 digits
– slash
– 2 digits

Example: GSZ 1/20

PS. Even though the correct format always uses capital letters, the user might not use capital letters in his search. This is why I think we can’t go specifically for capital letter matches in the formats.

Hi Mikko,

I hope you had a nice start into 2022. Today I searched for the file reference number I ZR 20/21 on https://www.ra-plutte.de. 0 results were returned even though this post have been returned: https://www.ra-plutte.de/markenverletzung-auskunft-schadensersatz-uebersicht/. I guess the regex string needs a change, right? If you find time, I would appreciate an update a lot.

Best, Nick

Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, das h?rt sich exakt genauso an wie bei mir.

Eine Frage: Was meinen Sie mit

in der Theme facebook.php

? Welche Datei soll das sein im Sinne von, wo finde ich sie? In meinem Theme Ordner (sowohl Haupttheme als auch Child Theme) gibt es keine derartige Datei.

Au?erdem: Sind Sie sicher, dass es n?tig ist, zus?tzlich zu facebook.php auch die header.php zu ?ndern oder ist das doppelt gemoppelt?

• This reply was modified 3 years, 3 months ago by RA_NPL.

Done ??

Hi Mikko, now it works like a charm. Very impressive, thanks for your outstanding support. This customization improves the search quality in my blog quite significantly.

Hi Mikko,

many thanks for your snippet. I implemented it according to your explanation and rebuilt the index. In the “Debugging” tab, the reference numbers are now displayed without spaces in between, so for example when debugging https://www.ra-plutte.de/schadensersatz-wegen-weiterleitung-von-ungeschwaerztem-urteil/, the file reference number 5 O 84/21 is now displayed as 5o8421 in the “Content” section of the “Debugging” tab. If I understand your approach right, this is correct behaviour because now after removing spaces, the minimum number of chars is high enough to be detected in user searches.

– However, if I search for 5 O 84/21 now via the regular search function in the frontend of https://www.ra-plutte.de, I get 0 results (of course I cleared the browser cache). The search url created is https://www.ra-plutte.de/?s=5+O+84%2F21&submit=Suche.

– If I search for "5 O 84/21", I also get 0 results. The search url created is https://www.ra-plutte.de/?s=%225+O+84%2F21%22&submit=Suche

Am I missing something?

• This reply was modified 3 years, 5 months ago by RA_NPL.
• This reply was modified 3 years, 5 months ago by RA_NPL.