richinberlin99
Forum Replies Created
-
Oh please. A holier than though taking of the high road we are so misunderstood “what we do is really hard” response from Scotty from marketing? I just explained I did a manual multi-site export import myself in 3 steps. Export. Find and replace. Import. You are dishonestly overstating difficulty.
Whatever. Like I said. If it wasn’t for your overpriced silliness on the multi-site option I’d not have bothered to work out I didn’t really even need the cheaper pro version either so yiuve saved me that renewal so cheers for that.
I was on the page.
I set it to only run, on images without an alt text.
It ran, changed the alt text on ALL images, and that was that.
I’m also not super happy anyway, with the settings. The alt texts just describe the whole image, whereas I might wish it to focus on the main item.
if I have a large rug, with a chair on the edge, I might want to tell it it to focus on the most prevalent item, but I cant.
So its not for me. At the price? I can still pay someone from the Phillipines to do it, cheaper, and more accurately.Forum: Reviews
In reply to: [Name Directory] bit too basicSweet. Ive sent you
a. A copy of the command i gave chatgpt
b. A copy of the plugin.
c. A video, detailing how i did it.Forum: Reviews
In reply to: [Name Directory] bit too basicOK, yep, that clears it all up.
a. You’ve made basic plugin.
b. You know many people want category functionality, they should contact you to get it.
c. I’ve now made my own plugin, replicating functionality, but with categories.
d. No, I won’t be sharing it. It’s a hacky combo that requires first the creation of custom posts, and then aligning the functionality with them. Additionally, I would not wish to support a plugin, that I built for my own use. I would then end up spending time supporting it, rather than using it.
My position remains, yours would be both better and match what most people see as MVP functionality by having category integration.
But it’s all good. I assume you get more business from it, in its current format, so fair enough.
For me? I’m also now sorted.- This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by richinberlin99.
Forum: Reviews
In reply to: [Name Directory] bit too basicSome fair points, let me further elaborate.
1. By Style a category, I meant to choose to display the category beside the name or not. Yes. poorly worded by me, improper use of the word style, I agree.
2. 3000 installs. Well, that’s because there is nothing else. Hundreds of millions watch keeping up with the Kardashians. I won’t give them 5 stars either. My personal opinion of something is not affected by how many people do or do not do something. I just don’t care.
3. Yes, I’ve rated it as not doing something, that I think it should do, regardless it was not designed to. If someone designed a car, with no doors, and said, with my car, you are meant to Dukes of Hazard yourself through the windows, I’d similarly point out – that’s not providing the basic functionality most people will want. And there, we get to the crux of it. My review is based on that. Clearly, your plugin was not designed to do what I want. Because it wasn’t. But its within reason to give a review on the basis of something missing obvious, basic functionality. The functionality of everything in WordPress is to have a category.
4. I didn’t need to discuss it. I don’t need support. It’s an objective review of your plugin not doing something It can be reasonably expected to do. I am curious why you care at all. The plugin is free. There is no paid version. There is no pathway to add the functionality which I am sure many would want. I can see, others have also noted the problem.
Look. In 90 minutes, I’ve been able to replicate the functionality of your plugin with some basic requests to Chatgpt, and added in the functionality that I needed. That is the world we live in now.
If you are happy with the plugin working how it does, then leave it. My review remains in place, so people checking it out will realise that it doesn’t do categories. Many, like me, will not read the full spec first, and get caught out. I see others, already have. So my review helps those people who in fact want categories, expected them, and didn’t bother to read the fine print.I should have quietly informed you that your plugin title was intentionally deceptive? What for? You already know and aren’t going to change it. I did so in a review, so others won’t waste their time thinking your plugin will do what it claims to when it won’t. Not without payment. My review was for their benefit. Not yours.
Nowhere in your product information is it stated the Woocommerce functionality will require payment. You’ve intentionally left this out. Own it. Intentionally deceptive. What… it’s NOT intentional? Its an oversite? Then update your product description to make it clear even though your plugin refers to Woocommerce coverage in the title, access to this will require payment.
Or don’t. And get reviews like mine.
As for my business and its clients. I am always 100% transparent with what they are getting, and at what price, from the start. If I gave them a bait-and-switch, I would expect them to be similarly annoyed.
I won’t respond further.
NO. My review is fair. Your Free plugin, describes itself in its very name, as being for WooCommerce. You’ve named it such, for SEO and traffic reasons, knowing that it’s not an honest portrayal of what it does.
I pay for plugins all the time. It’s not about the money. It’s about misrepresentation.
You’ve named your FREE plugin as a WooCommerce plugin which it isn’t.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP] Image not being outputForum: Plugins
In reply to: [Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP] Possible to add editor to articles?done
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP] Possible to add editor to articles?Sweet.
ETA?
Coffee donation link?Yes, when i turn off Yoast, everything works. When i turn it back on, the custom faq posts are not created.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Cache Enabler] No caching after update, rollback also failedNot disallowed per se.
Just not functioning.Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Cache Enabler] No caching after update to 1.6.0Question. Are you using wpengine as a host? I have multiple sites using this plugin, its also stopped working for me, but only on sites hosted on wpengine
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Cache Enabler] No caching after update, rollback also failed1.4.9 works.
If I upgrade to 6, stops workingForum: Plugins
In reply to: [Cache Enabler] No caching after update, rollback also failedWondering if perhaps, its an nginx issue? ALl working fine for many of my other sites, all of which are on apache