Demir
Forum Replies Created
-
Forum: Everything else WordPress
In reply to: Google – Page indexing > Not found (404)We made the necessary changes in the Header section.
Thank you very much for your support.
Best regards!Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [LiteSpeed Cache] Refreshing the cache when commenting on an articleHi,
The problem was solved with the code you sent.
Thank you.Best regards.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [LiteSpeed Cache] Is LiteSpeed ??Cache running unstable?Hi,
A support ticket has been created.
Thank you for your help.Regards!
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [LiteSpeed Cache] Is LiteSpeed ??Cache running unstable?Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [LiteSpeed Cache] Is LiteSpeed ??Cache running unstable?Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [LiteSpeed Cache] Is LiteSpeed ??Cache running unstable?Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [LiteSpeed Cache] Is LiteSpeed ??Cache running unstable?Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [LiteSpeed Cache] Is LiteSpeed ??Cache running unstable?Hi again,
I want to know if the pages are cached. The following information is given in the LiteSpeed Cache document. I do not come across these lines in the source code of any page on my site. What could be the reason for this?
“You should see headings similar to these:
X-LiteSpeed-Cache: miss
X-LiteSpeed-Cache-Control:public,max-age=1800
X-LiteSpeed-Tag:B1_F,B1_These headings mean the page had not yet been cached, but that LiteSpeed has now stored it, and it will be served from cache with the next request.
Reload the page and you should see X-LiteSpeed-Cache: hit in the response header. This means the page is being served by LSCache and is configured correctly.PS: The X-LiteSpeed-Cache header is most common, but you may see X-LSADC-Cache if your site is served by LiteSpeed Web ADC. You may also see X-QC-Cache if your site was served via QUIC.cloud CDN. These alternate headers are also an indication that LSCache is working properly on your site.”
Regards!
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [LiteSpeed Cache] Is LiteSpeed ??Cache running unstable?Hi,
“Q2) try check the http requests header on these 3 browsers , see what difference do they make”.
After your response above, I took the page source outputs for three browsers and saved them in this pdf document. As can be seen on this document, Opera and Firefox show the cached page that was generated at the same date and time. But Safari is coming from a different cache.
There is another issue that caught my attention: Opera and Firefox broadcast from the same cache file unless the cache is deleted or expired. Safari, refreshes its cache frequently, I could not test how long it took. But this happens many times a day.
I’m not a programmer, so I don’t understand anything from the codes I sent. Can you help me solve this issue?
Regards!
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [LiteSpeed Cache] Is LiteSpeed ??Cache running unstable?Hi,
Thanks also for the additional information.
WebP format is not using for images. All images on the site are in JPEG or GIF format. For image optimization the Smush plugin is using. Therefore LiteSpeed Image Optimization is not active. According to this information, will it be a problem if I OFF the cron lines that contain “WebP”?
Regards.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [LiteSpeed Cache] Is LiteSpeed ??Cache running unstable?Hi,
You’re right!
On the “LiteSpeed ??Cache Settings” page, in the “Cleaning” tab, “All pages” remained checked, I unchecked it. I have arranged the other boxes in this area according to my site. I cleared all Cache and ran Crawler Cron manually. This process took quite a long time, you can see the result on this screen. All pages are now comes very quickly, thanks LiteSpeed ??Cache!I really like the LiteSpeed ??Cache application. Their documentation is very well and professionally prepared. The more I read, the more I learn.
I have two questions that I can’t find the answer to (perhaps because of my carelessness) among these documents.
Question 1:
What are the functions of lines such as “Guest”, “Guest – WebP” etc. seen on this screen? How do I decide which of these is necessary or not?Question 2:
I have 3 different browsers on my MacBook; Safari, Opera and Firefox. It’s the same date and time when all the Crawler work is done, when I call my site’s homepage from Opera and Firefox and it is cached at the bottom line of the page sources. However, when I want to view the same page with Safari, it does not come from the cache, the page is reloaded. When I look at the page source in Safari, the cache date and time is the date Safari loaded it. Opera and Firefox still show the page cached by the crawler. What could be the reason for this? Can it be fixed?Regards!
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [LiteSpeed Cache] Is LiteSpeed ??Cache running unstable?Hi,
Thank you for your explanations.
What do you say about GTmetrix analysis?
Why does it score badly in the first analysis as if it has never been cached, and score well in the second? Can you explain why?Regards.
Hi again,
Problem was solved.
Thank you for your help!
RegardsHi @harishanker,
I have no experience in writing code, I have not written a single line of code for my site so far.
How can I find a sample code that will give a specific role the right to view and edit all comments on the site? Can you help me with this? I wouldn’t want to buy another plugin for this little feature.
Regards.
Hello there,
I’m having the same problem. I am using the newspaper theme and copied the code in the theme’s header.php file, just above the “<head />” line. I cleaned all the cashes. However, the popup subscription form does not appear.
My site address: https://www.arthenos.com
Thanks in advance for your attention and help.
Regards.