sehnot

Same issue here. Works with Chrome but not Firefox…

@ben here you go:
https://phototrix.wpengine.com/2015/10/08/ankunft-in-rio-de-janeiro/

the category and tags are below the content, while at the demo
https://www.competethemes.com/tracks-live-demo/2014/02/23/this-is-a-standard-post/
they are left of the content, at the beginning of the text.

Same here. They are below the content!

Any news on this?

Works great for me, what errors do you get?

Finally found the solution by comparing the style.css files of my installation (v1.2.5) and the demo (v.1.1.9):

The difference is that the version 1.2.5 misses three lines, all of them were setting the height to 40px!!!

You can get a working copy of the style.css file here:
https://thriveweb.com.au/themes/pinzolo/wp-content/themes/pinzolo/style.css

I have exactly the same issue. After adding entries to the main menu, they appear in the menu bar, but the height increases to 81px (40px before). I have no idea, why that happens. I didn’t find the reason with Firebug either…

Any idea?

If you search Google for ‘change the text of the “more” link’ the first result is:
https://codex.www.ads-software.com/Customizing_the_Read_More

Hi,

Is really no one facing that issue? I’m using the latest WordPress version and the default theme – can’t be anything wrong with that. Even if most people use standard posts, there must be someone using post formats…

Thanks!

So the “initial status” works as a filter? Then you should be able to select several options for the initial status: The article can only be submitted to a workflow if its status matches one of the selected workflow statuses at “initial status”…

Or, you have a combination of two drop downs: status “is”/”is not” <status list>

Either way, sounds great!

Thanks, great news!

Hi nuggetsol,

we currently use a second workflow (one workflow for new content, one workflow for updates), but that has some disadvantages. When an author selects the wrong workflow (and believe me that WILL happen, no matter how well you train them) you run into two problems:
1) The workflow is simply wrong, meaning wrong people are involved which is bad, but no show stopper
2) The content of the site gets messed up which is a huge issue! Let me explain:

The workflow for new content sets the status to something like “draft” or “pending” until the very last step, as everyone involved has to approve it first.

The workflow for updates sets the status to “published” from the first step, because otherwise your article gets removed from the site just because of a small change (like a correction of a typo).

Now, here is what happens when someone submits to the wrong workflow
Example A:
1) Author creates a new article, but submits to the “update”-workflow
2) The workflow publishes the article without any approval!

Example B:
1) Author updates an article, but submits to the “new”-workflow
2) The workflow un-publishes the article!!!
3) The article is not visible to the public until everyone approves it

Therefore the flag for the workflow would guarantee that an author can’t select the wrong workflow and already published articles can’t be un-published.

Finally, for the “update”-workflow somthing like this https://www.ads-software.com/support/topic/updates-without-unpublishing-posts would be great!

Thanks!

Thanks, that’s great!