Swedbank Pay

Version 3.0.1 has support for MobilePay

Hi, @kavalieris. Thanks for reaching out! Which payment instrument would you like to use in Latvia? Card payments are available globally, but other payment instruments are unfortunately only available in certain Scandinavian countries.

Sorry, we don’t have an ETA on the feature, but it is planned and will be developed as soon as we find time to do it.

Hi, @skafte and thanks for the report. Yes, it is correct that the plugin currently requires manually completing orders, but it is on our backlog to perform capture automatically for two-phase payment instruments such as card if the products being purchased are virtual.

Hey Skafte,

What happens when you confirm the order? In the normal situation you will be redirected to Swedbank Pays payment page where there is a form to complete the payment with the customers card details.

Hi. I’m sorry you’re having trouble. Have you activated the plugin in WooCommerce?

Thank you for the bug report. A GitHub issue has been created to track it.

Thanks for the bug report. An issue on GitHub has been created that we will follow up on.

• This reply was modified 4 years, 5 months ago by Swedbank Pay.

Hello. The major difference between Checkout and Payments is that Checkout allows for payer identification (“Checkin”) in Norway and Sweden, which speeds up the payment process because payment details are remembered between purchases.

Hello. The major difference between Checkout and Payments is that Checkout allows for payer identification (“Checkin”) in Norway and Sweden, which speeds up the payment process because payment details are remembered between purchases.

Thank you for your bug report. It has been added to our backlog and will be investigated. If we conclude that this is a problem in our plugin, we will fix the bug and provide a new version as soon as possible.

Yes, we are working on adding MobilePay. We can’t promise an ETA, but it’s in our backlog and will be prioritized once more pressing issues and features are implemented. Thank you for your patience.

Sorry for the late reply, but we have received no notifications of the activity, otherwise we would of course have replied much earlier.

We have clarified our disclaimer now to underscore that it is unsupported, not that the technical quality is necessarily bad. As mentioned by @exerto, the plugin is used in production by several customers.

I would not say rolling your own implementation is necessarily better than to base your integration on an existing implementation, as you will only have more work to do and you would be left in the same place regarding support either way.

So please feel free to use the plugin and if you have questions or ideas for improvement, you are welcome to submit them on GitHub.